AKCheese
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2014
- Messages
- 2,463
- Reaction score
- 813
I’m sure there will be all sorts of people butt hurt if somebody else wears #87 in the near future.... friggin junior high crap
You seemed to be insinuating that maybe the poster you were quoting is correct that he hasn't declined and would match or surpass his best season as a pro. I was simply saying that just because your numbers aren't quite what they used to be doesn't mean that you have declined. Team, philosophy, role, quarterback, etc all play a role in your production level.I don’t think you quite understood the conversation with that reply, but I’m glad you at least saw the major point.
You seemed to be insinuating that maybe the poster you were quoting is correct that he hasn't declined and would match or surpass his best season as a pro. I was simply saying that just because your numbers aren't quite what they used to be doesn't mean that you have declined. Team, philosophy, role, quarterback, etc all play a role in your production level.
I most certainly understood the conversation, but IMO you made a lousy point to mention Graham's production. I agree he's declined slightly, but it's lazy to reference his best season to support your argument.
This will be the first time Graham has been featured in an elite offense since 2014. I'm interested to see what he provides.
If you're going to attempt to make the case that the Seahawks have had an elite offense over the past few seasons then I don't know what to tell you.You can say that Rodgers is a better QB than Wilson (and be right) but saying that Graham hasn't been in an elite offense since 2014 is incorrect. The 2016 Packers scored more points than the Seahawks but the Seahawks averaged more yards per attempt passing the ball. Same thing in 2015. I'll also point out that the Seahawks completion percentage in 2015 was higher than the Packers and basically the exact same in 2016 (65 vs 64.9). Graham is not the player he was after his knee injury. That's not based on production that's just based on the amount of separation that he gets now verse what he got pre-injury. He's still a very good slot WR and should help the team, but I don't think he's anywhere close to the player he was when he was in New Orleans.
Stats don't tell the story. You do realize his production didn't go down until he played 3 years with the most overrated QB in football, right? Wilson isn't even CLOSE to being on the same level as Brees, let alone Rodgers. Wilson also hasn't had decent pass protection the past few seasons. With Rodgers, Graham's numbers will be much closer to 2011-2014 than 2015-2017. It's not even about that anyway. It's about how much of an asset he will be in the offense. Brees has never distributed the ball to his different receivers as well as Rodgers does. Brees targeted Graham more than 150 times a couple of those seasons. That's how Brees plays. He picks a favorite target and goes to that guy over and over and over.Lol. He’s definitely not the same player he was in his prime, stats and eye test both indicate that, not sure how anyone could possibly say there’s nothing to indicate graham has declined some. But hey you might be right, it’s possible he has a career year here and surpasses the 1200 yards and 16 tds he had in the 2013 season
I like the signing, but like many others I agree that Kendricks needs to go. He's done essentially nothing in 2 seasons to distinguish himself.
You seemed to be insinuating that maybe the poster you were quoting is correct that he hasn't declined and would match or surpass his best season as a pro. I was simply saying that just because your numbers aren't quite what they used to be doesn't mean that you have declined. Team, philosophy, role, quarterback, etc all play a role in your production level.
I most certainly understood the conversation, but IMO you made a lousy point to mention Graham's production. I agree he's declined slightly, but it's lazy to reference his best season to support your argument.
This will be the first time Graham has been featured in an elite offense since 2014. I'm interested to see what he provides.
Stats don't tell the story. You do realize his production didn't go down until he played 3 years with the most overrated QB in football, right? Wilson isn't even CLOSE to being on the same level as Brees, let alone Rodgers. Wilson also hasn't had decent pass protection the past few seasons. With Rodgers, Graham's numbers will be much closer to 2011-2014 than 2015-2017. It's not even about that anyway. It's about how much of an asset he will be in the offense. Brees has never distributed the ball to his different receivers as well as Rodgers does. Brees targeted Graham more than 150 times a couple of those seasons. That's how Brees plays. He picks a favorite target and goes to that guy over and over and over.
Drew brees to Russell Wilson. That explains everything imo.Lol. He’s definitely not the same player he was in his prime, stats and eye test both indicate that, not sure how anyone could possibly say there’s nothing to indicate graham has declined some. But hey you might be right, it’s possible he has a career year here and surpasses the 1200 yards and 16 tds he had in the 2013 season
Didn’t Shannon Sharpe play well into his 30’s too? He was good for a long time. I want to say a TE from K.C. as well....oh yea Tony Gonzalez I think was his name? Both were good for a very long time and I think Tony played into 40’s. Someone correct me if I’m wrong, been a long time since they played.He's not old. Most TEs of his caliber play at a high level well into their mid-thirties. He should have 4-6 good years left in him.
The thing for me is yeah, Lewis is a terrific blocking TE, but maybe he's not bad as a receiver either. Consider that although he only caught 24 passes last season, they went for about 13 YPC and 5 TD's. Add to that the Jags were a predominately running team and their QB is Bortles. I'm giving this signing two thumbs up.
Well, you're right about that. What's been said has been said.I never said he wouldn’t be an asset, it’s obvious he’s an upgrade over any
tight end we’ve had in years. That still doesn’t change anything I’ve said.
Didn’t Shannon Sharpe play well into his 30’s too? He was good for a long time. I want to say a TE from K.C. as well....oh yea Tony Gonzalez I think was his name? Both were good for a very long time and I think Tony played into 40’s. Someone correct me if I’m wrong, been a long time since they played.
Drew brees to Russell Wilson. That explains everything imo.
I read Jimmy Graham said "I'm still 6'7". I still run 4.5s"........ that right there I didn't realize.... this dude is a super freak. #12 is going to feast!
With Jones, and Monty putting up 6ypc the last couple years. And Williams looking very solid. I'm optimistic we will have a run attack, to go along with our pass game, this year.
Mercedes Lewis is going to give us a wicked 2 te formation
idk. i have a feeling they've seen all they need to see of him. lewis is rated the better blocker, and the better all-around te. as i mentioned earlier $2.25m cap hit is a lot for a guy who won't play.Kendricks has only been a Packer for 1 season. I'm not sure how the Packers feel about Kendricks and I guess we will find out if Lewis was signed to replace him or just to add more depth. I still think evaluating Kendricks only based on what he did last year, would be short sighted given the circumstances of being in a new system and having Hundley as his QB for much of the season.
You would think that if the Packers were done with Kendricks, after signing Lewis, they would have immediately released Lance. If he isn't cut soon, my guess is that they want a healthy preseason battle between the 2 and one gets cut or they just want to be 3 veterans deep at TE, I would prefer the latter.idk. i have a feeling they've seen all they need to see of him. lewis is rated the better blocker, and the better all-around te. as i mentioned earlier $2.25m cap hit is a lot for a guy who won't play.
Not sure about the salary ramifications but you would want to keep Kendricks around as long as possible in case of any kind of injury to one of the other tight ends.You would think that if the Packers were done with Kendricks, after signing Lewis, they would have immediately released Lance. If he isn't cut soon, my guess is that they want a healthy preseason battle between the 2 and one gets cut or they just want to be 3 veterans deep at TE, I would prefer the latter.
Agreed. He is due to get a $300K roster bonus and a $1.25M salary.Not sure about the salary ramifications but you would want to keep Kendricks around as long as possible in case of any kind of injury to one of the other tight ends.
Agreed. He is due to get a $300K roster bonus and a $1.25M salary.
I really don't see any big advantage of releasing him at this point. IMO, I don't really see him not being kept on the final 53 eith, if he earns it. The TE is an important position and if Graham goes down, $1.55M isn't that big of an insurance policy with a player that has Kendricks resume.
What proof is there that this is even true?For sure.
Lance isn’t getting cut.
MM loves TE’s, and Lance is a versatile player. He’s staying.
I doubt that both TT and now Gute would be signing top FA TE's over the last 3 years if MM didn't request having them.What proof is there that this is even true?
What proof is there that this is even true?
sure. they may let the summer play out and see what's up, maybe even the preseason, they may want to sign another FA and need the space, but i bet kendricks is gone. jmo. no biggie.Not sure about the salary ramifications but you would want to keep Kendricks around as long as possible in case of any kind of injury to one of the other tight ends.
Yes gbgary, that is my thought also. Though we may keep him. It will totally depend on the roster situation and if a young TE shows a lot of potential.sure. they may let the summer play out and see what's up, maybe even the preseason, they want to sign another FA and need the space, but i bet kendricks is gone. jmo. no biggie.