Pokerbrat2000
Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
I think the fact that Gutekunst and LaFleur essentially confirmed that Rodgers was consulted in the head coaching search, along with the fact that Rodgers reached out to LaFleur prior to the Packers offering him the head coaching position, suggests that the organization now feels that he does need to be involved and that his thoughts/opinion at least matters, if only slightly.
Like it or not, Rodgers is the single most important individual in the Packers organization. Should he get veto authority on personnel decisions? Of course not. But I see absolutely nothing wrong with at least giving him a heads up on certain critical moves. You know, like they did with the coaching search...
Nothing at all wrong with that.
I think the level that Rodgers was involved in the hiring of LeFleur is being blown out of proportion. Rodgers was told after Murphy and Gute had targeted MFL as the next coach. Rodgers was a part of the "Leadership Committee" and Gute talked to them and several players after the season was over. Guessing to gain some insight as to what direction they wanted to head, but had the Packers hired a different head coach, I'm pretty sure people could spin this and say "Rodgers wanted MFL but the Packers didn't listen to him and hired...."
http://www.wtmj.com/news/was-aaron-...-prior-to-the-hire-of-matt-lafleur-/973484093