gopkrs
Cheesehead
- Joined
- May 12, 2014
- Messages
- 5,709
- Reaction score
- 1,438
I know people have said Hill had a finger injury on his throwing hand. But I have not heard anyone possibly giving him a break from his poor performance because of it.
Hill's INT's we're horrible decisions, not errant passes due to his finger. No breaks on bad decisions...sorry.I know people have said Hill had a finger injury on his throwing hand. But I have not heard anyone possibly giving him a break from his poor performance because of it.
He's an upgrade with his rushing ability, so there's something... Their average QB rating is pretty close actually 80.7 vs. 80.6 (career). So don't act like it's not close. I'd edge to Hill given he is more versatile.Hill isn't an upgrade over Siemian at quarterback at all.
There is a difference between being "the best" at all those positions individually VS what he does as one player at many positions. You make it sound like he isn't even NFL caliber at any of the positions he plays. When you look at "the best" on each team at the positions we are talking about, his salary doesn't come close to top dollar for all those positions. The Saints are paying him for his ability to play a number of different positions, not for being a top level NFL player at each of those positions.The Saints would most likely be better off using NFL caliber players at each of those positions instead of Hill. While he can have an impact at each of the positons you mentioned he's a downgrade for ever pro level player excelling at his respective position.
Sean Payton seems to disagree with a couple of your points.
He's an upgrade with his rushing ability, so there's something... Their average QB rating is pretty close actually 80.7 vs. 80.6 (career). So don't act like it's not close. I'd edge to Hill given he is more versatile.
There is a difference between being "the best" at all those positions individually VS what he does as one player at many positions. You make it sound like he isn't even NFL caliber at any of the positions he plays. When you look at "the best" on each team at the positions we are talking about, his salary doesn't come close to top dollar for all those positions. The Saints are paying him for his ability to play a number of different positions, not for being a top level NFL player at each of those positions.
I don't think you and I will ever agree that the Saints value Hill for what he can do for the team and are paying him what they feel that value is worth. Trying to convince yourself that I or the Saints think that he is a starter that excels at anyone one of the many positions that he plays, is you trying to create a debate that has never existed.
Is there an injury problem with Siemian, or does Payton just prefer Hill? With all the injuries, it's hard to evaluate any player on that team fairly.Sean Payton seems to disagree with a couple of your points.
That's good news!I’ll only say Hill made Love look like a HOF passer!
Except they're practically identical when passing is considered and Trevor is playing for his third franchise. Meanwhile, NO is certainly holding onto Hill and would have handed him the reigns if he was healthy.There's no doubt Hill presents an upgrade over Siemian running the ball. While their pass ratings are nearly identical I consider Siemian to be a superior passer.
Captain, I never said a single word about Hill's contract.
Except they're practically identical when passing is considered and Trevor is playing for his third franchise. Meanwhile, NO is certainly holding onto Hill and would have handed him the reigns if he was healthy.
Captain,
The conversation (as many do) veered off into a comparison of Hill vs. Siemian. Then and only then did I engage in such conversation merely pointing out that you think Siemian is the better QB while Sean Payton believes Hill is the better of the two.
Captain,
The conversation (as many do) veered off into a comparison of Hill vs. Siemian. Then and only then did I engage in such conversation merely pointing out that you think Siemian is the better QB while Sean Payton believes Hill is the better of the two.
I'd go so far as to say that most people think Hill is the better of the two. And Winston isn't even under contract next year. If Taysom plays well here on out, he could be the starter week 1 next year.
I never disagreed with you on his contract. Kind of a mindboggling deal to me.I'm fine with someone arguing that Hill is a better quarterback than Siemian. I don't understand a team guaranteeing to pay him $21.5 million as he's not a starting caliber player at any position though.
Did you watch Hill vs. the Cowboys? I would be excited if the Saints make him the starter for next season as they would definitely struggle mightily.
Sure did. Not his best showing. But as you know, you don't judge a player on one game. Otherwise, Favre would have been cut after his brutal showing against the Rams in 2002.Did you watch Hill vs. the Cowboys? I would be excited if the Saints make him the starter for next season as they would definitely struggle mightily.
Sure did. Not his best showing. But as you know, you don't judge a player on one game. Otherwise, Favre would have been cut after his brutal showing against the Rams in 2002.
Maybe it'd be good for you to review just how many multiple interception games Trevor Siemian has, then compare to good ol' Taysom. Then you can come back and change your tune.
What kind of money are you talking about? His contract is not as straight forward as the headlines it drew.My point remains that Hill isn't a starting caliber quarterback and it's insane to pay him that much money.
Not a cap expert, but what am I missing through 2023 that doesn't make it headline worthy?What kind of money are you talking about? His contract is not as straight forward as the headlines it drew.
"The New Orleans Saints and quarterback Taysom Hill have agreed to a one-of-a-kind four-year "hybrid" contract extension worth up to $90M, per reports."Not a cap expert, but what am I missing through 2023 that doesn't make it headline worthy?