rodell330
Cheesehead
Because in no way did Adams have a promising rookie year, followed by a HORRIFIC 2nd year were he was one of the worst recievers in the league and then rebounded to be a damn good WR this year and was statistically the best WR in the entire league over a 5-6 week stretch.
And yeah its not like our CB situation was horrific when both Randell and Rollins were hurt and the entire D improved dramatically when they returned to the lineup.
Sophomore slumps are a thing whether you want to believe it or not
You need a different definition of the word "facts".
Heaven forbid a player that's in his 3rd, count it 3rd, year of playing football since HS takes a step back once teams got tape on him. Rollins was and still is a project that was never expected to play as earmy as he did
So if he is a "project" then Why waste a 2nd rd pick on a guy from
Miami of Ohio of al places that you could've gotten in the 4th rd? And why did they feel
Ok letting Hayward go if he wasn't expected to play as early as he did? See where this may cause some contradiction in your response? Not saying it didn't make sense...but it's not clear what your point is.