D
Deleted member 6794
Guest
Not a reliable stat. Could probably say the same for WR. After all we have umdrafted GMo starting, which is what you want to avoid.
But are the starting OTs any good? Just googled top 10 NFL OTs. Brought up OL.
1 was undrafted
4th round - 1 (Bahk!)
3rd round - 1
2nd round - 2
1st round - 5
Rather help AR out with outstanding OL play than WRs. Keep him healthier as well as helping AJ out as well.
Well, according to your search half of the top 10 offensive linemen were drafted after the first round, meaning the Packers might not have to spend their first round pick on a tackle to replace Bulaga after all. While I agree that pass protection is important for being able to throw the ball effectively having a decent receiving corps is as well.
The Packers lack a #2 receiver and a tight end for that to be true though.
Back on Oct. 15 Pkrjones called for Lazard to be the #2 WR. Some of you mocked that stance, comparing Lazard to Janis and accusing Lazard's proponents as having a "crazy mindset".
Well, here we are two months later. The Packers have made Lazard the defacto #2 WR for several weeks now. Lazard is ninth in the league in yards/target.
The simple fact of the matter is that Lazard is better than every Packer WR other than Adams. Pkrjones saw that first. This was never about the greatness of Lazard, it was about how bad the early season #2 & #3 WR's were, which was evident back in Oct. Allison and Scantling are so unproductive now that Kumerow is probably moving up to #3 next.
Worth noting that Lazard's big body plays into LaFleur's outside zone scheme because Lazard can really do some nice blocking in the run game, too. Nice little side benefit to playing Lazard more.
Hats off to Pkrjones for having excellent foresight on this one, good call on Lazard! Pkrjones was right, the naysayers were wrong.
Lazard has been a pleasant surprise this season but I don't want the Packers to rely on him being the #2 receiver entering next year.