D
Deleted member 6794
Guest
No, UDFA snap counts aren't anything to be satsfied with. Having one of the most talented NFL teams, the most successful, and that has won a SB and contends every season is a source of satisfaction. And the reason for that success is the TT method of team building. Whether you agree or disagree with it.
As I've said repeatedly and you keep ignoring, overall Thompson has done a pretty good job during his tenure as the Packers GM. But don't fool yourself, Aaron Rodgers (for whosw selection TT deserves a ton of credit) is the main reason for the Packers being a perennial Super Bowl contender.
The fact that you are so certain you know how TT could improve at his profession is a bit out there. As Poppa points out, you have lots of stats, but there is a disconnect when it comes to really understanding or appreciating the job of an NFL GM. No perspective with reality.
I'm not claiming that I would be able to do a better job than Thompson. But I would have at least tried to address obvious positions of need over the last few years (ILB, TE, FS) with more than some late round picks or undrafted free agents.
And your continual assertion that there is a "TT can do no wrong crowd" is old and condescending. I see packer fans who appreciate his work. It would be like someone complaining about ARs faults an demand he be upgraded after any offensive play that doesnt result in a TD. Any contradiction would be from people who must think AR can do no wrong. Followed by, well i'm more objective than you.
If you would be able to accept that Thompson isn't perfect you would have taken an objective look at the list of multi season starters the Packers got out of UDFA and agreed that the perception that he's one of the best in finding those guys is simply not true. But you can't.
And of course once again you're putting words in my mouth. I'm not advocating for Thompson to be replaced. I want him to selectively use all methods available to improve the team.
Last edited by a moderator: