Pokerbrat2000
Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
I’m having trouble believing those numbers. Maybe St. Brown is just more noticeable to me When on the field
It's ok to admit you have a man crush on him.
I’m having trouble believing those numbers. Maybe St. Brown is just more noticeable to me When on the field
To add to the debate, EQ, Adams, and Jake were the 3 starting WRs yesterday per NFL game records. Kumerow had 57 snaps to EQs 39.
ETA: EQ was knocked out of game with 9:30 left in the 4th quarter. So he was available for all but about 1/4 of the game.
Then be prepared to be surprised. I believe he's quoting the official NFL/Elias counts because in the past I've seen his numbers line up with other sites that post later in the week.and he’s right? I would be very surprised to find out MVS had double the snaps of brown, even with brown leaving early.
Down load the "pending" official stats from the NFL. They're someplace on the page, depending on your device. From my PC they are above the popup video near the top of the page. Pending because I believe stats go official sometime on Tuesday.I didn't pay close attention, but I did notice EQ motion to the sidelines a few times that he wanted to come out. Maybe EQ and his Dad, need to work on his conditioning over the off season?
Packers had about 30 snaps on offense after St. Brown was laid out. Almost one third the total. Snaps which Kumerow and MVS split without EQ being available. Moore did not get any snaps on offense.I am surprised. And though I noticed Kumerow on the field quite a bit, I wouldn’t have guessed he had close to double the snaps of EQ either
He took a shot on his 14 yarder inside 2 mintues of the first half. Same play as the ejection. He got up motioning for a sub.I didn't pay close attention, but I did notice EQ motion to the sidelines a few times that he wanted to come out. Maybe EQ and his Dad, need to work on his conditioning over the off season?
I can't say I've ever seen Graham actually handle his guy. The announcer gave him kudos for a block on St. Brown's nice catch and run on that bubble screen in the 3rd. quarter, even circling Graham on the replay. Really? Graham barely got two hands on the defender who was caught leaning the wrong guy, then dove and fell down reaching for St. Brown. What we can say is Graham sometimes successfully gets in the way.Studs-
Jimmy graham blocking
Hard to disagree or agree with this A win is a win and in this case, it was against a pretty bad team that spent the day getting yellow flags thrown at them. The win also is a bit of a loss for the Packers in the way of draft position. All that said, was an entertaining game, that saw most of the players put it all out on the field and I wasn't expecting that to be honest.Duds: The team beating a bad Jets team, and acting like they won a SB. Seriously guys? The fact it had to go to OT shows just how far we have to go. Too little too late.
I can't say I read every post in this thread, but I'm not not seeing anybody acting like they won a SB.Duds: The team beating a bad Jets team, and acting like they won a SB. Seriously guys? The fact it had to go to OT shows just how far we have to go. Too little too late.
Time to put you on ignore. First time I've used it.As well all should...
That was unnecessary. It looks like he was banned for life. Rule #1: Don't sass a moderator.Time to put you on ignore. First time I've used it.
That was unnecessary. It looks like he was banned for life. Rule #1: Don't sass a moderator.
I can't say I read every post in this thread, but I'm not not seeing anybody acting like they won a SB.
I think they were happy to get a win on the road in an exciting finish. You're going to begrudge that? They should want to go out on a positive note, as should we. I am of the school that says to h*ll with a couple of draft slots. Just as winning is a habit, so is losing, and not ingraining that negative habit is a plus.The players, not us?
I thought I detected the "seriously, guys" being inwardly directed.The players, not us?
I’m still trying to figure out how we can ban him from the entire internet lol.You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Only a mother walking down the basement stairs and cutting the cord can accomplish that.I’m still trying to figure out how we can ban him from the entire internet lol.
If that were the case, the forum would be shut downThat was unnecessary. It looks like he was banned for life. Rule #1: Don't sass a moderator.
But MVS outplayed him all year. This was just a reps game for him imo. When he played this year he missed a lot of catches and ran wrong routes, he frustrated me all year long. No way he moved past MVS just because of finally having a strong showing against a terrible jets team.Seems like one player has had his snaps and opportunities going up while the other has had his go down compared to earlier in the year. I though EQ was out there more than MVS today.
Yep... I can’t confirm or dispute that stat... because I simply don’t know. However, it wouldn’t surprise me at all. I have been very critical of Rodgers this year, but I also recognize his talent and still am very glad he is the Packers’ quarterback. I am pretty optimistic that we will see a better offense next year.Not sure if this has been mentioned...if so, my apologies.
But there was something mentioned in an article somewhere, I cannot currently think of where, but it said that Rodgers is the only quarterback in the history of the NFL to throw for 400+ yards, throw 2+ passing touchdowns, and run for 2+ touchdowns. He did it in this game, and he did it several years ago as well.
For those who didn't see or read about it.
Not sure if this has been mentioned...if so, my apologies.
But there was something mentioned in an article somewhere, I cannot currently think of where, but it said that Rodgers is the only quarterback in the history of the NFL to throw for 400+ yards, throw 2+ passing touchdowns, and run for 2+ touchdowns. He did it in this game, and he did it several years ago as well.
For those who didn't see or read about it.