The jury is still out on Chicago. To me they are too new and unproven. Minnesota while they are formidable, they are highly overrated. We can still beat them thanks to having the superior QB, but changes need to be made. I'm pissed Oakland traded Mack to Chicago than to GB. Chicago getting him was huge.
be my guest... I’ll put my posting record against yours anytime.
Lol ok you put your 3 years on this forum against my 2 weeks? Then we can compare imgur likes on comments.. finally let's throw instagram likes? Oh wait, that's right it proves nothing.
How about just the last hour lol... It’s not about likes or dislikes... it’s about Not posting nonsense.
This seems to be the running excuse for Whitt, "this guy or that guy is inexperienced", but these guys were probably the best players on their college team, unless of course they were a WR.
, so I am not buying into the "inexperience" thing too much. With all the draft resources thrown at the secondary I expect a lot more. I also expect even an UDFA that has made the 53 not to make stupid mistakes whether its hitting a guy out of bounds, missing a tackle or crashing into your own teammate (something we have seen a few times this year).
Lol... Frankly I have no idea whether Whitt needs replacing or not. I just think it’s funny that you are drilling down this deep into the defense so quickly.... you may end up being right. I’m hoping not simply because I want the defense to continue to improve and that means I want to believe they are on the right course.This seems to be the running excuse for Whitt, "this guy or that guy is inexperienced", but these guys were probably the best players on their college team, unless of course they were a WR.
I do agree with you, if you cut the head (MM) off the snake, do you loose the tail (Pettine). I would hope that the new Head Coach of the Packers will recognize that Pettine knows what he is doing and retain him....but ....*COUGH COUGH*....Fire Whitt. Hey....was I wrong about Janis?
I can't find a "how is this relevant emoji" but I will at least give you this one for that post.......
I actually think that Pettine has improved many phases of the defense, but the secondary still seems stuck, especially if you factor in how much of our draft resources have been put into it. Imagine if the Packers had spent the kind of draft capital that they have spent on the secondary in the last 5 years on the DL or Linebackers.
Perhaps, but I definitely see an improvement there as well. I recall early in the game where Wilson was sacked and Aikman was calling it a coverage sack... I remember thinking when was the last time I heard that regarding the Packers’ defense?
Ok..... maybe the bad loss and miller lites had me read your replies wrong...I apologize if that's the case.
King was actually 2nd round pick... The Pack traded away the first round pick last year.
And SO FAR.... I’m not convinced that they aren’t becoming a talented group.
Give them a pass rush and they will be legit?
yeah... i’m still sad about that.... even worse it’s beginning to look like King (while talented) is made of glass.Give them a pass rush and they will be legit?
My bad, forgot we decided not to draft TJ Watt and traded back to grab King.
I can't find a "how is this relevant emoji" but I will at least give you this one for that post.......
lol except Rodgers was responsible for 4 of the 5 winsDUDS: All those who blamed last season solely on Brent Hundley.......He at least had us at 5-5 at this point in the season!
Been there brother, not my fondest memories lol.Funny, too many Miller Lites usually only made me bring the wrong women home.
