I think Aaron Rodgers should just call the plays
Like would ANYONE be mad?
There's no way an offense would be more successful with the quarterback calling the plays.
Adams, Graham,& Jones are our big playmakers on offense, like Rodgers said, those guys should be getting way more attempts and more involved in the offense. And that “3 headed monster” needs to go. Jones needs like 20+ rushes a game with Williams in there to spell jones and Monty shouldn’t be getting carries. If jones doesn’t rush around 20 times a game, we’re doin something wrong.
Adams and Graham had a combined 20 targets vs. the Bills with Jones getting another 12 touches. It's impossible to get all of them the ball more often, especially with Rodgers throwing Allison's way 11 times as well.
With Jones missing most of camp as well as not being allowed to practice for the first two weeks of the season while being suspended and the game vs. the Bills decided early I'm absolutely fine with McCarthy limiting his work.
I watched Mariota yesterday, and the highlights of Trubisky, and the difference in the amount of separation is startling. And it's not like those teams have great WR groups, just great play designs.
You're losing any credibility when suggesting the Packers offense should strive for being like the Titans or Bears one.
But we’re talking 1 game here, the offense has been living on Rodgers arm and stale for years now.
The Packers made Rodgers the highest paid player in the league, of course they're mostly relying on him to make plays.
The keyword I saw on the media describing the Packers offense today was "unimaginative". This contrasted with clips of Bears receivers wide open and talk of young coaches with cutting edge offenses.
It's absolutely ridiculous to suggest the Bears have a more innovative offense than the Packers after they played a Buccaneerd team on pace to allow the most points in NFL history.
Or we could see more wide open throws against receivers who are running down the field being covered by a linebacker.
Do you understand that no matter the offensive scheme a linebacker ending up covering a receiver was a result of a mistake on defense???
Wouldn't a game where the QB isn't as good, against a terrible opponent, be a great way to see how effective the offensive gameplan really is?
The Bills have a pretty solid defense. So you're blaming McCarthy for not coming up with a game plan making up for Rodgers missing throws and receivers dropping balls while the run blocking was average at best??? That's insane.
MM on the other hand, has great offensive players but he gets a pass because they're not playing to their potential?
Once again, aside of Rodgers and Bakhtiari the Packers don't have any great players on offense.
I think you're a little confused as to what the responsibilities of a head coach are. He only has himself to blame for not playing his QB in the preseason.
And if the head coach can't come up with a game-plan because his QB's knee is hurt and he lacks some of his usual mobility (looked fine against Buff) then he's a pretty crappy coach.
I'm absolutely fine with McCarthy not playing Rodgers during the preseason. While that might result in him being rusty early during the season there's no reason to risk him getting injured in meaningless games.
It's lidicrous to suggest that it's pretty easy to game plan around Rodgers being injured.
The offense is not imaginative at all. They run the same sets, same routes, and same personnel pkgs.
The Rams (81.4%) used more 11 personnel than any other team in the league (59.3% average) last season yet featured the highest scoring offense in the NFL. It's all about execution.