I'm not sure where you're going with this but, yes, I was around during the Lombardi years. My point is that it's a two-way street -- both the coach and QB matter, they're not exclusive of one another nor the rest of the team. Saying that McCarthy is a terrible coach if not for Rodgers is the akin to saying that Lombardi was a bad coach if not for Starr. For that matter, it's like saying Holmgren was a bad coach if not for Favre. Lest we forget he also took the Seahawks to the SB with Matt Hasselbeck at QB and what was his draft status?
No argument with the bold. To me, it's just a matter of how much. On of the biggest things to come out about Vince over the years is that he got the best out of his players. If they needed TLC, the patted them on the head. If they needed a kick in backside, he did that. If there were issues outside the Packers, he worked with players on those. Plus, he was responsible for getting the players, as well as using them. Actually, I think the reference to Holmgren bolsters my side of the discussion - part of Holmgren's claim to fame is bringing Favre under control; also, yes, Hasselbeck was not a standout QB, which tells me that Holmgren was a great coach. Holmy's problem was wanting total control. Heck, lots of people think Sherman was a good coach, but his acquisition of players couldn't be tolerated.
Anyhow, I'm probably wrong in responding in this thread. As I said, there is so much more to the Lombardi story, and this thread is supposed to be about McCarthy. If I see one about Lombardi, I'll be glad to participate.