Watched the game plan in the first half = McCarthy sucks! Team plays with no heart MM sucks! MM has lost AR, he sucks!
Tell us how you REALLY feel.
Watched the game plan in the first half = McCarthy sucks! Team plays with no heart MM sucks! MM has lost AR, he sucks!
If you want to be viewed as anything more than a troll/ blowhard it would help to point out specific areas and rooms for improvement in what you're seeing beyond "McCarthy sucks."Watched the game plan in the first half = McCarthy sucks! Team plays with no heart MM sucks! MM has lost AR, he sucks!
If you want to be viewed as anything more than a troll/ blowhard it would help to point out specific areas and rooms for improvement in what you're seeing beyond "McCarthy sucks."
"What was wrong with the first half gameplan? How has he lost this team? Any proof AR has lost faith?" Answers to any of these would do.
considering we won on defense and running last time against MN it wasn't a crap game plan. toss in all the offensive line changes and the struggling pass game, it looks like an even better idea.When is the last time
The game plan was run, run, run... Why? In th 4th Qt. he set AR loose and the offense started to produce. Crap game plan IMO. 70 yards passing in the first half with AR at QB, really?
If you want to be viewed as anything more than a troll/ blowhard it would help to point out specific areas and rooms for improvement in what you're seeing beyond "McCarthy sucks."
If you look up the qualifications of being a great leader, Mike McCarthy's outstanding leadership skills have been self evident.
Watched the game plan in the first half = McCarthy sucks! Team plays with no heart MM sucks! MM has lost AR, he sucks!
Until Rodgers runs every play to absolute perfection, he needs to shut up and run the play without an attitude. Players play, coaches coach. No man is bigger than the team, not even Rodgers. If this is truly the case, quit rolling the eyes, quit second guessing everything and run the offense
with all the missed passes, fumble 6's, INT's in the endzone and dropped passes, I wouldn't say he's handcuffed anybodyWell spoken COACH..now call plays that will result in yardage and or scores and stop handcuffing your QB, running backs and receivers. Also tell your receivers to run the routes at 100% speed and when the QB has to roll out don't stop and watch him keep running modified routes to give the QB a chance to get you the ball.
Believe it or not sometimes the QB is smarter then the coach, like or not. In this case Rogers does have a leg up on MM and his ego...
Excellent post JB.I don't think so. He's been at it for 9 years as the offensive line coach. In those 9 years, he has produced the no. 1 offensive pass protection line (by sacks allowed) in 2007, followed by no. 14, 30, 21, 23, 31, 26, 13, and no. 17 so far this year. He has fielded run blocking lines ranked 26th in 2007; followed by 19th, 9th, 23rd, 16th, 25th, 5th, 8th and currently his line ranks 24th in run blocking this season.
So, overall his lines have ranked have ranked 17th in run blocking; 19+ in pass blocking. If you throw out the no. 1 line he inherited in 2007, his pass blocking lines rank 22nd in the league over 8 years. This year's line is a bit worse than the average line he's fielded in the last 9 years.
Maybe the talent he's been given over that time is just ordinary as well. Certainly there has been a huge player turnover in 9 years, with little consistent improvement. Sitton, Lang and the 2 young centers appear to be the exception in offensive linemen under his tutelage. Apparently they are just superior athletes, and "coachable", if you accept that all the others weren't. We've never replaced Clifton and Tauscher.
Since 2008 A. Rogers ranks no. 1 in the league in interception percentage of 1.6 and QB rating of just over 105.
The numbers seem to suggest that Rogers, and the Green Bay Packers offense, has excelled in spite of ordinary line play; not because of it. So, as Rogers gets older year by year, we stick with the same coach to develop talent to protect him, when he rarely has accomplished it in 9 years.
Remember Larry Beghitol?If you change players but not improve the quality of the players, changing the coach will make no difference. Again, what is your evaluation of the OT talent Campen has available to him? Here's mine: Bulaga was a first rounder who has struggled with injury, Bakhtiari was a 4th rounder who has battled injuries since preseason and that has ended any hope he would improve his play from last season. Barclay is a UDFA who has never been even adequate at OT - he's an OG. And Jeremy Vujnovich is a UDFA on the PS. You apparently think another OL coach can significantly improve the play of the current "talent" at OT. I think you are suggesting firing Campen just for the sake of it and ignoring the real problem: Lack of talent available.
Yes. And I remember Joe Bugel and neither of them have anything to do with the talent, or lack of talent Campen has had to work with.Remember Larry Beghitol?
Why wouldn't Thompson do what he sincerely believes will lead to the success of the Packers? If he put teams on the field that led to multiple championships wouldn't that be the most "self-serving" thing he could do? Wouldn't people be even more likely to "proclaim him a genius"? I get why fans disagree with Thompson's MO in building and sustaining a team - I disagree with it - by why ascribe motives to him other than he sincerely believes in what he is doing and has believed it even before he became GM of the Packers?Thompson seems more intent on being self-serving by acting like he is allergic to the FA market just so they can keep that 95% home-grown figure and people can proclaim he is a genius, when only about 15% of those players are actually good by NFL standards and are pulling most of the weight on the team.
The fact is, this is your opinion and not a fact.The fact is without #12 both MM and TT would be long gone.
Is Rodgers getting sacked 50 times each year best for the team? How can people be okay with these awful offensive lines he's played behind?Why wouldn't Thompson do what he sincerely believes will lead to the success of the Packers? If he put teams on the field that led to multiple championships wouldn't that be the most "self-serving" thing he could do? Wouldn't people be even more likely to "proclaim him a genius"? I get why fans disagree with Thompson's MO in building and sustaining a team - I disagree with it - by why ascribe motives to him other than he sincerely believes in what he is doing and has believed it even before he became GM of the Packers?
You mean, your opinion is, because this team could be very different and still successful without Rodgers. His position and his salary have resulted in the team we have. I'm sure it would look quite different if he weren't here.
Besides, I'm not convinced many head coaches or gms would have had the stones to draft and then play Rodgers over the face of their franchise