JJ Watt Cardinals 2 yrs 31 mill

D

Deleted member 6794

Guest
So, with the lowered salary cap, the franchise tag is cheaper too. I think they could sign Jones for around $8/year rather than $12. Think I saw Nagler talking about this.

According to Over The Cap the franchise tag for a running back will be set at $11.1 million. That's way too much for the Packers to consider putting it on Jones.
 

thequick12

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
3,235
Reaction score
620
According to Over The Cap the franchise tag for a running back will be set at $11.1 million. That's way too much for the Packers to consider putting it on Jones.

Well that's not entirely true...if they think they can get more than a late 3rd round pick for him in a trade or they'd prefer to get that late 3rd this year than as a compensatory pick in 2022, we could see the franchise tag used. But yes there is no way they can have him count 11 m against the cap in 2021
 
D

Deleted member 6794

Guest
Well that's not entirely true...if they think they can get more than a late 3rd round pick for him in a trade or they'd prefer to get that late 3rd this year than as a compensatory pick in 2022, we could see the franchise tag used. But yes there is no way they can have him count 11 m against the cap in 2021

The Packers would have to create enough cap space to fit Jones' franchise tag under the cap in the first place though. Even if they considered trading him afterwards that limits their ability to make other moves in the meantime.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,620
Reaction score
8,876
Location
Madison, WI
I'm not arguing, but on the NFL radio this morning they said running back was nearly the cheapest at 8. something million.

Agreed. Not sure if Captain grabbed old numbers. I don't think the tag prices are set until the cap number is firm.

Here is the latest info that I could find.

Position by position for 180/183/185, all figures in millions:

QB: $24.76/$25.17/$25.45
WR: $15.76/$16.03/$16.02
RB: $8.54/$8.68/$8.78

https://www.si.com/nfl/2021/02/22/monday-afternoon-quarterback-franchise-tag-salary-cap-cam-newton
 

RRyder

Cheesehead
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
1,781
Reaction score
192
Agreed. Not sure if Captain grabbed old numbers. I don't think the tag prices are set until the cap number is firm.

Here is the latest info that I could find.

Position by position for 180/183/185, all figures in millions:

QB: $24.76/$25.17/$25.45
WR: $15.76/$16.03/$16.02
RB: $8.54/$8.68/$8.78

https://www.si.com/nfl/2021/02/22/monday-afternoon-quarterback-franchise-tag-salary-cap-cam-newton

The franchise tag is based on what the average number is for the top 5 players at the position is over the last 5 years or 120% of the players previous salary (whichever is greater)
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjAoegQIORAF&usg=AOvVaw294EyWbNuDFi6rsqjF0QEB

What the cap is doesn't factor in. Unless there's been an amendment to the cba I didn't know about
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,620
Reaction score
8,876
Location
Madison, WI
The franchise tag is based on what the average number is for the top 5 players at the position is over the last 5 years or 120% of the players previous salary (whichever is greater)
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjAoegQIORAF&usg=AOvVaw294EyWbNuDFi6rsqjF0QEB

What the cap is doesn't factor in. Unless there's been an amendment to the cba I didn't know about

I think you missed part 3 in the article that you quoted. That is why the Franchise tag will be lower this year.
  1. Summing the amounts of the franchise tags for players at that position for the five preceding league years
  2. Dividing the resulting amount by the sum of the salary caps for the five preceding league years
  3. Multiplying the resulting percentage by the salary cap for the upcoming league year
 

Jerellh528

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
1,165
Reaction score
146
I don’t know why people are still trying to somehow justify having Jones on this team. Dillion was drafted for this very moment. Paying rbs these days is a fools errand.
 
D

Deleted member 6794

Guest
I'm not arguing, but on the NFL radio this morning they said running back was nearly the cheapest at 8. something million.

Agreed. Not sure if Captain grabbed old numbers. I don't think the tag prices are set until the cap number is firm.

Here is the latest info that I could find.

Position by position for 180/183/185, all figures in millions:

QB: $24.76/$25.17/$25.45
WR: $15.76/$16.03/$16.02
RB: $8.54/$8.68/$8.78

https://www.si.com/nfl/2021/02/22/monday-afternoon-quarterback-franchise-tag-salary-cap-cam-newton

I took the numbers from Over The Cap.

https://overthecap.com/franchise-transition-and-rfa-tenders/

It's possible they didn't account for the projected salary cap drop-off for next season.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,620
Reaction score
8,876
Location
Madison, WI

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,620
Reaction score
8,876
Location
Madison, WI
I don’t know why people are still trying to somehow justify having Jones on this team. Dillion was drafted for this very moment. Paying rbs these days is a fools errand.


Why? Because Jones is head and shoulders that much better than Dillon. I don't think many of us are hoping the Packers will pay Jones top 3 RB money, but I can totally see where Franchise tagging him and paying him $8M might be well worth the 1 year investment. Really it would come down to cap money being made available to do that, which with some creative contract restructuring (of current players), wouldn't be that difficult.

How Jones reacts to and plays under a tag, is also another aspect that I am sure Gute and Co. are thinking about.
 

lambeaulambo

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
2,740
Reaction score
805
Location
Rest Home
oh bloody hell...A Jones while out of the realm of average IS an important piece, I dont see him being here this coming year. All this JJ Watt talk while interesting, is about as likely as Jones staying here. I'd love to have both, but I think its a dream to think either will end up here.
 

swhitset

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 28, 2015
Messages
4,373
Reaction score
1,245
oh bloody hell...A Jones while out of the realm of average IS an important piece, I dont see him being here this coming year. All this JJ Watt talk while interesting, is about as likely as Jones staying here. I'd love to have both, but I think its a dream to think either will end up here.
Normally I’d agree with that .... but I just have a feeling that the Packers are really trying to land Watt.... It may not happen, but I think this is far more likely than some think.
 

PackerDNA

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
6,754
Reaction score
1,701
Just read that some team has offered Watt 15 to 16 million per year. If true, we can forget about the idea of him coming here.
 

ARPackFan

Knock it off with them negative waves
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
725
Reaction score
262
Location
Arkansas
Just read that some team has offered Watt 15 to 16 million per year. If true, we can forget about the idea of him coming here.

The article I saw only indicates the contract is worth that much. Maybe it's a 2 year deal with all money guaranteed? As with all contracts it's in the details and at this point it may be the agent throwing numbers out in an attempt to drive the price up.

Multiple sources told Russini that the most lucrative offer Watt currently has on the table is believed to be worth between $15 million and $16 million.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/30962022/sources-free-agent-jj-watt-offers-multiple-nfl-teams
 

Poppa San

* Team Owner *
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
13,240
Reaction score
3,050
Location
20 miles from Lambeau
Just read that some team has offered Watt 15 to 16 million per year. If true, we can forget about the idea of him coming here.
That's easy to do. Example: 4 years, $20m signing bonus, $5m 1st year, $10m second guaranteed, last two years $5m roster bonuses and $10m per. Throw in some incentives and walla $16m per year. 1st year cap hit $10m, 2nd $15m + incentives and workout bonuses. Average annual can be spiked with say $20m-25m for last year or two.
 

swhitset

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 28, 2015
Messages
4,373
Reaction score
1,245
That's easy to do. Example: 4 years, $20m signing bonus, $5m 1st year, $10m second guaranteed, last two years $5m roster bonuses and $10m per. Throw in some incentives and walla $16m per year. 1st year cap hit $10m, 2nd $15m + incentives and workout bonuses. Average annual can be spiked with say $20m-25m for last year or two.
true... but the article posted above yours doesn’t even suggest that he is being offered that much... it says that that the “most lucrative contract on the table is believed to be worth 15-16 million dollars”. The quote does NOT say “per year” Unless it’s a 1 year deal being offered .... those numbers start to look very affordable.
 

longtimefan

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
25,480
Reaction score
4,170
Location
Milwaukee
The article I saw only indicates the contract is worth that much. Maybe it's a 2 year deal with all money guaranteed? As with all contracts it's in the details and at this point it may be the agent throwing numbers out in an attempt to drive the price up.

Multiple sources told Russini that the most lucrative offer Watt currently has on the table is believed to be worth between $15 million and $16 million.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/30962022/sources-free-agent-jj-watt-offers-multiple-nfl-teams

Agent spin

3 years 24 mill?
 

GleefulGary

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Messages
5,014
Reaction score
507
Why? Because Jones is head and shoulders that much better than Dillon. I don't think many of us are hoping the Packers will pay Jones top 3 RB money, but I can totally see where Franchise tagging him and paying him $8M might be well worth the 1 year investment. Really it would come down to cap money being made available to do that, which with some creative contract restructuring (of current players), wouldn't be that difficult.

How Jones reacts to and plays under a tag, is also another aspect that I am sure Gute and Co. are thinking about.

Jones is better than Dillon, currently.

However, is his impact significantly better to justify the pay? I lean towards no.
 

easyk83

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Messages
2,783
Reaction score
280
I for one am really bullish on what Dillon brings to this offense and the way he compliments what we have.
 

Dantés

Gute Loot
Joined
Jan 21, 2017
Messages
12,116
Reaction score
3,036
We can't know for sure, but the most likely reason why we would be hearing rumors about how much teams are offering Watt right now would be leaks from his camp/agent trying to leverage an offer from a team he doesn't want to play for to get more money from a team that he does want to play for.

For instance, I could imagine the Raiders offering him 16M annually, him having no interest in playing for them, but wanting to use the offer to get a team like the Packers or the Bills to come up a little bit on a current figure they have out to him.
 

Pugger

Cheesehead
Joined
Aug 26, 2008
Messages
2,724
Reaction score
839
Location
***** Gorda, FL
Just read that some team has offered Watt 15 to 16 million per year. If true, we can forget about the idea of him coming here.

He was making $17M in Houston. If anybody offered him 15 to 16 he would have signed it by now. I suspect this is agent speak trying to instigate a make-believe bidding war. JJ is a nice player but not at that price at this point in his career. I hope Gute doesn't go above $10M per. Let him go to Vegas.
 

Poppa San

* Team Owner *
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
13,240
Reaction score
3,050
Location
20 miles from Lambeau
true... but the article posted above yours doesn’t even suggest that he is being offered that much... it says that that the “most lucrative contract on the table is believed to be worth 15-16 million dollars”. The quote does NOT say “per year” Unless it’s a 1 year deal being offered .... those numbers start to look very affordable.
Doesn't say one year deal either. I was just pointing out to a poster that said 15-16m puts him out of reach that if it were a multi-year deal it is easy to get to high annual numbers without actually committng to them. There is no clickbait if they said multi-years for 15m total.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Top