To Jax
The value of the 2015 draft is, in a way, water that went under the bridge last year and prior, with 2018 closing out their rookie contracts.
Let's say some those guys had panned out. They'd get paid now, there would have been less cap, and some of these new free agent contracts would not get signed. Or they would have moved on as unaffordable and you'd be back to where you are now.
geesh!Thus closing the book on Ted Thompson's Failed 2015 draft.
1. Damarious Randall, CB (30th overall pick)
2. Quinten Rollins, CB (62)
3. Ty Montgomery, WR (94)
4. Jake Ryan, LB (129)
5. Brett Hundley, QB (147)
6. Aaron Ripkowski, FB, (206)
6. Christian Ringo, DE (210)
6. Kennard Backman, TE (213)
While the 5th. year option on Randall would have been a deal had he been Pro Bowl caliber, the rest would have to get paid now what they are worth if they were such players. While there is presumably less risk in paying your own players as known quantities within in a system, paying these 5th. year players had they panned out, recent history has borne that out: Perry, Cobb, Matthews.While somewhat of an optimistic way to look at it, what we don't get out of the 2015 draft class is a 5th year option from one guy or any starters or backup players from the others. The risks of second year contracts aside, I would rather roll that dice on a good quality homegrown player, one that you invested valuable draft capital in.
As far as the money to sign new free agents, I doubt we would have had to spend that money, nor the draft capital along the way to try and make up for the busted picks as each one busted out.
The other thing lost here, is the compensatory picks you can get from losing guys after their 4th/5th year. Jake Ryan is the only one of the 2015 draft that made it that far to account for it, but won't matter at this point, we won't be receiving a CP in 2020.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
While the 5th. year option on Randall would have been a deal had he been Pro Bowl caliber, the rest would have to get paid now what they are worth if they were such players. While there is presumably less risk in paying your own players as known quantities within in a system, paying these 5th. year players had they panned out, recent history has borne that out: Perry, Cobb, Matthews.
Bottom line: If you're paying a star player $2 - $3 mil under a rookie contract that's a key piece in getting aggregate performance over pay. If he gets $10 or $15 mil per year starting in year 5, not so much.
Where in anything I said did I put lipstick on the 2015 draft? I didn't.I think you can put any kind of lipstick you want on the 2015 draft class, but the bottom line to me, it was pretty much a failed draft class. Much like the 2011 class, but at least Cobb emerged out of that one.
Wouldn't be surprised if they felt he was too much like Martinez and Pettine is looking for a faster, more disruptive compliment to Martinez?I had hopes that they'd bring back Jake Ryan for cheap. He had 80+ tackles in his second and third seasons and, I thought, was headed to even more in 2018 before blowing out his knee. He seemed to be dependable and might have been a good compliment to Martinez in 2019 for the right price. Oh well.
Where in anything I said did I put lipstick on the 2015 draft? I didn't.
To repeat, my point is when a draft class gets to its 5th. year, which in that is case now, there are no bargains left in the class regardless of what you had done. The damage from that draft was incurred in 2015 - 2018. If those players were any good you'd pay them now or replace them now, and the pay-over-perforance advantage evaporates.
The damage from the 2015 draft is water under the bridge. Mediocre drafts in 2016 and 2017 is a price paid in the 2016 - 2019 window. 2018 and 2019 draft classes better pan out or there isn't any way forward.
No, what I'm saying, and I don't know how I could have make it clearer, is if those players were any good they would be in the 5th. year, second contract. You'd be paying those guys or you'd be signing these new free agents but not both.Now maybe all you are saying is, "let it go, it doesn't matter, since they are all gone now"?
No, what I'm saying, and I don't know how I could have make it clearer, is if those players were any good they would be in the 5th. year, second contract. You'd be paying those guys or you'd be signing these new free agents but not both.
If they were any good they'd now be outside what is always the critical window of cheap players from the last 4 drafts which is now 2016-2019. 2015 is therefore water under the bridge.
No, what I'm saying, and I don't know how I could have make it clearer, is if those players were any good they would be in the 5th. year, second contract. You'd be paying those guys or you'd be signing these new free agents but not both.
If they were any good they'd now be outside what is always the needed critical mass of cheap players from the last 4 drafts still on rookie contracts which is now 2016-2019. 2015 is therefore water under the bridge.
This free agent group isn't a replacement for the 2015 draft that never way; they are making up for deficiencies in the last 3 drafts.
I can't think of another way to say it.