I took a beating last year when I talked about benching Rodgers to give Love 5 games of experience as the starting QB, as well as potentially improve the Packers draft position. If the Jets take that stance, after what they paid for Rodgers in draft capital and salary, the media and NY fans are going to go absolutely batshit crazy. That wouldn't be just giving up on a season to protect 32 positions on a single draft pick, that would be admitting that Rodgers was a mistake in the first place and have more ramifications for them in 2024 than just the change in pick.
They didn't trade for Rodgers to play for 1 year, they want him there for the rest of his career. Maybe this season doesn't go as planned for them, but unless Rodgers absolutely stinks, benching him due to the conditions on that pick, would be franchise suicide.
Well said. I do recall your suggestion that GB let Love play those last 5 games. That was the optimal call, but as long as they had a chance at the playoffs and a 4-time MVP, Rodgers wasn't going to sit. Ironic then that it all collapsed in another heart-breaking loss at home.
And the pressure for Rodgers to play every snap, barring injury, will be overwhelming. They didn't give up that much draft capital expecting Rodgers to play one year.
I don't know what to expect from the Jets. The organization has put themselves under an incredible amount of pressure - returning DROY and OROY, an elite D, and now Rodgers. I think the O line is the weak spot, and Rodgers isn't very elusive any more, but he is smart. I mean the Jets could win 12 games, or win 9 or less. Can't say I'd be surprised by either.
But one telling sign that Rodgers is exerting influence is the arrival of Lazard, Cobb, Turner. Other than Lazard, I'm guessing the Jets could have filled the Cobb and Turner spots with better players.
Just get Rodgers 65% of the snaps, and then I don't give a **** what the Jets do.