If you name call again, you won't like the resultFake news post with no verified anything in it
Stupid ****head
Even though I think Cousins will fold in the playoffs, they are a team I would prefer not to face.While the Vikings comeback against a three win team may be discounted, most teams wouldn't have made the right adjustments. The Broncos gave a good defense. To put up 27 in one half against them shows that they will be a tough out in the playoffs. Their balance between the pass and run along with a good defense that can get off the field and force punts is not to be underrated.
Fun fact. Since Cousins joined the Vikings he has outplayed Aaron Rodgers.
http://pfref.com/tiny/d6vcB
Right.You have to consider Rodgers suffering a broken collarbone in 2017 and playing injured for all of last season though.
And regardless of who has "played better" or who has had the better statistics or the better team, there will never be a time that Kirk Cousins is a better quarterback than Aaron Rodgers. Unless Rodgers gets to the point that Brady is at right now.
I'm thinking I don't want to face anyone. Just a bye to the super bowl and then not have to play Baltimore.Even though I think Cousins will fold in the playoffs, they are a team I would prefer not to face.
Their time management sucks in addition to bad playcalling during the last drive.Denver coaching staff is the dud of the week.
Carolina was definitely way, way out of line. Raptorman has been allowed for years though to bring a complete anti-Packer tone to a Packer message board, though, and I'm not really sure why. And then he gets taken aback when he meets resistance.
If I brought the opposite tone onto purplepainforums.com and started trashing the Vikings defense and started questioning the legitimacy of their championships, well, championship, I would be run out of there quickly.
Cousins 40-33-2 53% win percentage
Rodgers 38-26-1 58% win percentage
Well if facts are anti-Packer I would agree with you. But, are my facts wrong? Has Cousins played as well? If you go by wins and losses as well as other stats they are about even. That's not anti-Packer, that's just facts. If you want to talk about some other intangibles, sure, Rodgers is better. But Rodgers was hurt in 2017. So what happens if we go back to 2015 and 5 years' worth?
2015-2019
Code:Cousins 40-33-2 53% win percentage Rodgers 38-26-1 58% win percentage
The difference is 3.5 games over 5 years. So, answer this, what's the mark of a good QB? Everyone and I mean everyone has been on Cousins for his $83 million dollar deal and people everywhere have questioned it. He can't win. That's the beef. He can't win big games. That's not anti-Packer, it's just facts. 56-14. That's Brady's W/L for the same five years. So tell me, what does Brady have that any different? Believe it or not, their numbers are close. I won't make you guess. Brady has a defense. Always has.
http://pfref.com/tiny/RwP06
As to going to PP and questioning the defense, about half of them would agree with you right now.
As to questioning the one lone Championship, no one would believe you are Packer fan. Matter of fact, be careful discussing that, some here might not believe you are Packer fan.
One more time..... not me.Not me.