H
HardRightEdge
Guest
He's near the top of the heap in red zone passing performance, where the rubber meets the road.the way he's playing (middle third of the league in most stat categories).
He's near the top of the heap in red zone passing performance, where the rubber meets the road.the way he's playing (middle third of the league in most stat categories).
Boyle? No. If Rodgers were to suddenly retire you'd want to draft a guy and sign a relatively cheap vet to start for a transitional year and take your lumps.Who's to say that after 3 years under AR that Tim Boyle isn't ready to take the reigns after the 2020 season (or sooner if AR goes down)? AR's contract is front-heavy w/ negative cap until after the '20 season. If he chooses to walk or Gute elevates Boyle (or other) & cuts AR there's cap savings then.
2008 was not very kind to us.The Packers should think about drafting Rodgers successor starting with the 2021 draft.
Actually Jones and Williams have combined to have more receiving touchdowns than any other running back during Rodgers tenure as the starter helping him improve his rating.
If Tagovailoa drops to the Packers first round pick it might be smart to pull the trigger though.
While Rodgers hasn't performed up to his standards over the past two years Packers fans should realize that it's close to impossible to adequately replace a future HOF quarterback and should appreciate having one while it lasts.
I highly doubt Boyle will ever develop into a decent starter in the NFL.
On the field the Packers couldn't have imagined a better transition.
That actually would have gone just fine if not for the childlike mind of Bret Favre.Just hope it goes better than the Favre Rodgers transition.
Don’t expect a response.He's near the top of the heap in red zone passing performance, where the rubber meets the road.
i said most categories. the red zone is where he's still very good. it's small ball in the red zone. if he had the same mentality between the 20's they'd be much better off. the Packers O is near the bottom of the league in drives ending with a punt, and 3 and outs. that's not totally on rodgers but he's the one with the ultimate decision what play is called.He's near the top of the heap in red zone passing performance, where the rubber meets the road.
I see. You want it all.i said most categories. the red zone is where he's still very good. it's small ball in the red zone. if he had the same mentality between the 20's they'd be much better off. the Packers O is near the bottom of the league in drives ending with a punt, and 3 and outs. that's not totally on rodgers but he's the one with the ultimate decision what play is called.
I would not be surprised if he asked for a trade sometime soon if it continues. Who could blame him?
Bottom line here is the organization seems to be too set on relying solely on AR...its maddening. He gets help and talent with his weapons and you would see fireworks like we havent seen since 95-96...just my take.
2008 was not very kind to us.
the Packers O is near the bottom of the league in drives ending with a punt, and 3 and outs. that's not totally on rodgers but he's the one with the ultimate decision what play is called.
0% ....from the little i've seen the clemson QB (lawerence i think?) looks pretty good. when he goes into the draft what are his chances of not being top5-10?
Don’t expect a response.
thought that might be the case.0% .
Provided we haven't sent the pick elsewhere for OBJ or the next Khalil Mackthought that might be the case.
in that case we need to go 0-16 the year previous to his draft
that's one of my points. execution has everything to do with it...and part of that is getting the ball out quickly and accurately. he's had a problem in both areas. you know that. you have eyes. you know the stats. you know what MLF wants. he executes MLF's small ball better than MM's spread (which he chooses to run almost all the time). stats show the guys are open but yes balls have to be caught, blocking has to be correct, etc. they're best when they're in that small ball mode. that stretch when they were without adams was their best passing (and offensive in general) stretch. they sustained drives as first downs was the priority. he's had his moments but rodgers has been pretty meh since adams return. i'm just saying that between the 20's he/they would be better off if he had that same red zone mentality (with the occasional shot) since he makes the final play call.And we all know that the call is the only deciding factor about a play being successful or not. Execution has absolutely nothing to do with it
So which is it? The "too comfortable" and "adapt and evolve" thing or lack of talent around him? He doesn't look complacent to me.Well....this is a sore subject...and hard to gauge. I'll just come out and say that I think Rodgers is too comfortable in Title town. He has earned his keep, no question about it, but...I don't know about his ability to adapt and evolve. He has not had much in the way of weapons here lately. Thats on the GM and scouts. Plenty of opportunity for better picks and smart free agency looks at the WR position, that is undeniable. There is also the factor of a very poor defense to practice and work against in the last 5 years...that has taken its toll on Aaron I think. I would not be surprised if he asked for a trade sometime soon if it continues. Who could blame him?
Bottom line here is the organization seems to be too set on relying solely on AR...its maddening. He gets help and talent with his weapons and you would see fireworks like we havent seen since 95-96...just my take.
God help the poor guy who comes here as the replacement.......Everybody is gonna hate the poor bastard anyway, nobody is going to give him a chance, and you KNOW that`s the truth.
he may want to finish his career in California, would he go to the 49rs after they didn't draft him?
that's one of my points. execution has everything to do with it...and part of that is getting the ball out quickly and accurately. he's had a problem in both areas. you know that. you have eyes. you know the stats. you know what MLF wants. he executes MLF's small ball better than MM's spread (which he chooses to run almost all the time). stats show the guys are open but yes balls have to be caught, blocking has to be correct, etc. they're best when they're in that small ball mode. that stretch when they were without adams was their best passing (and offensive in general) stretch. they sustained drives as first downs was the priority. he's had his moments but rodgers has been pretty meh since adams return. i'm just saying that between the 20's he/they would be better off if he had that same red zone mentality (with the occasional shot) since he makes the final play call.
I would draft a QB in the 2020 draft for his replacement. This will give him two years to sit and learn the system. I realize we need an OT, MLB and WR. But, we have the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th rounds for those positions. Maybe we can also get a couple of comp picks in the 4th found.
I say let's forget about all that and go for three Hall of Famers in a row.I really wouldn't worry to much about the post Rodgers QB for the Packers. It is likely to be a string of players while looking for the next franchise QB.
I could support going for the trifecta.I say let's forget about all that and go for three Hall of Famers in a row.
Yeah, we can get one Super Bowl win out of the new guy tooI could support going for the trifecta.