You definitely indicated that because you told me so there's no way I could disagree with you.
Where did I say that? I'm looking back at my reply to you in which you said that Jordy didn't produce enough, in which I had stated previously that wasn't case, as he produced more in comparison to our current receivers outside of Devante. I didn't say anything about that being "no way you could disagree with me. I simply refuted your argument.
That's on you on how you interpreted what I said, which I find odd as I didn't indicate anything of the sort, but simply countered your original point in regards to you saying Jordy didn't produce enough on the field to bring him back, to which I brought up what I had stated previously.
Simply because I refuted what you said, doesn't mean you're obligated to agree with me, but if it's something you believe to be true, then it would behoove you to defend it, when someone brings up evidence that leads to the contrary of what you said, as it would buffer their point, and not yours. And if you interpreted that way then that's on you. I didn't say anything about there being now way you could disagree with me, but merely stated that because I literally just brought up evidence that contradicted what you said in regards to Jordy, and especially comparing them to our current corps. If you didn't agree a point I made, refute it, just as I did with you. That's basic debating 101.
Nelson isn't that great of a receiver anymore if Bryant, Cook, Richards and Roberts all presented better options in the Raiders offense.
That may be and yet he ultimately had a better season in comparison to 3 out of the 4 players when it was all said and done. Cook being the only exception. And again definitely better than what most our receivers had outside of Devante.