lambeaulambo
Cheesehead
Allright Mac, youre in and the Narve dawg is OUT.
As his Attorney I would be forced to tell the truth about my own trauma.I just hope he's done trying to join the Mile High Club.
Ok Rodney!As his Attorney I would be forced to tell the truth about my own trauma.
As far as “Personal Space” let me tell ya about Personal up in Space. Why just my last flight on American Airkines.. this fat guy stuck his rear right into me as I sat trying to protect myself, all the while stowing his carry on. That alone should’ve been a $5mil Compensation. I Can’t unforget this!
If everytime someone brushed up against me on a flight was battery? I’d be richer than Rickey Rich on Lifestyles of the Richey and Famous
If everyone that called me inappropriate names or disregarded the sanctity of my vIrgun ears was deemed criminal? 1/3 of the Employees I’ve worked with would be serving time behind bars.
and NO! I am NOT your Sweetie!!
I just wonder if we're making the right move by cutting Narveson and keeping Hale on the practice squad. With that atomic leg of Narveson, if he ever does pull himself together and play up to his potential, it'd shorten the field 5-8 yards on every drive. That'd be a nice thing to have under contract for the next 10 years.
I agree with all of this. I especially agree with letting him go for another reason. There’s an obvious innate risk that these opportunities have for a PK in relation to some guarantee and that’s comes in both monetary and non monetary form.I would say the damage is done, best to break from him. If they get word from some remote Island in the Pacific Ocean that he and his buddy Wilson are looking good, then bring him back.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Agree and lets face it, would the Packers really bring Narveson back to the 53 (this season) if McManus didn't work out?I agree with all of this. I especially agree with letting him go for another reason. There’s an obvious innate risk that these opportunities have for a PK in relation to some guarantee and that’s comes in both monetary and non monetary form.
McManus is a seasoned Veteran in that he’s expecting some assurances at least short term. Having a 2-way or
3-way competition doesn’t help to employ his services. I think that would be almost disingenuous to keep Narveson (nothing personal Narvey) unless McManus been here for 3-4 weeks and had problems or some issue.
Yes there’s a risk for all players and we all know that they are betting on themselves long term. However we’re talking about initiating Employment and that might have even been a verbal condition by his Agent. It would be for me. I’m not dropping my life for a 2-week “tryout” if that makes sense?
noAgree and lets face it, would the Packers really bring Narveson back to the 53 (this season) if McManus didn't work out?