Pokerbrat2000
Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Who were the ILBs on that 2010 team? And yeah, they had a great D those two years.
Hawk and Desmond Bishop I believe. Nick Barnett started the year, but was lost to an injury in week 4.
Who were the ILBs on that 2010 team? And yeah, they had a great D those two years.
Thanks. Yeah I think that’s when Hawk was still playing well and Bishop was Bishop. I didn’t know Barnett was lost to injury. I think he’s the last great ILB they’ve had.Hawk and Desmond Bishop I believe. Nick Barnett started the year, but was lost to an injury in week 4.
Well if you believe what you hear from Gute lately, they think Burks could still be an answer at ILB. He will at least be around to try and win the job, but I don't think the Packers will or should bank on him doing so. I don't expect you to follow my ramblings, but I do believe that ILB is a position where the Packers have had a glaring weakness far too long and think it deserves more attention than others might.How do you see them addressing ILB? FA, Draft, both - and which players do you like?
I agree with your commentary. Holding out hope for Burks seems like a fool’s errand, with all due respect to Gluten. Maybe he does have the talent, but that does no good on the injury list. And FA is the best way to address ILB. It’s been a glaring weakness and they need someone with NFL experience. I’m not sure if Queen or Murray drop to #30. They’re logical first round picks. WR can be addressed in RD 2. The FA market for WRs seems lacking.Well if you believe what you hear from Gute lately, they think Burks could still be an answer at ILB. He will at least be around to try and win the job, but I don't think the Packers will or should bank on him doing so. I don't expect you to follow my ramblings, but I do believe that ILB is a position where the Packers have had a glaring weakness far too long and think it deserves more attention than others might.
They will still need to at least replace Martinez at the Mike. I think you need to do this through Free Agency. The job is just too important and technical to hand to a rookie. I will leave the "who" to Gute and the Packers. I think that goes beyond what we see on film, as you have to find not only a good player, but your defensive QB to replace Martinez.
If either drop to them, I would like to see the Packers use their first pick in the draft on Murray or Queen to compete against Burks for the other ILB position. I doubt that both fall to 30, but there is a chance one does.
Well if you believe what you hear from Gute lately, they think Burks could still be an answer at ILB. He will at least be around to try and win the job, but I don't think the Packers will or should bank on him doing so.
Yeah I don’t think Burks is more than just a guy at ILB. Maybe if they add a stud in FA (Corey Littleton) they keep him as a backup. Burks just hasn’t shown me anything. I don’t know his STs stats so maybe he provides some value there.Burks only playing a total of 57 snaps on defense from week 5 on while being healthy enough to line up on a majority of special teams plays isn't a good sign for him moving forward, especially as the Packers had a glaring need at inside linebacker last season.
My hopes for Burks went down significantly after not being able to find more time at ILB given the circumstances last year.Burks only playing a total of 57 snaps on defense from week 5 on while being healthy enough to line up on a majority of special teams plays isn't a good sign for him moving forward, especially as the Packers had a glaring need at inside linebacker last season.
Yeah and it tells you what the coaches are seeing, which is a reflection of practices. Burks is certainly athletic and looks the part. But we’ve seen plenty of those guys. That’s why I’m a skeptic when it comes to the combine. There are a lot of very athletic guys at the combine. Playing the game? That’s a different matter.My hopes for Burks went down significantly after not being able to find more time at ILB given the circumstances last year.
Why?Now if the packers would just replace him with Donald driver already
I'm not done with him by any means, he's certainly athletic enough to become a player. I know he's had some injuries that have slowed progress, but there were opportunities to take some snaps last year and he didn't take many despite being healthy.
Yeah I don’t think Burks is more than just a guy at ILB. Maybe if they add a stud in FA (Corey Littleton) they keep him as a backup. Burks just hasn’t shown me anything. I don’t know his STs stats so maybe he provides some value there.
I would realm just like the position filled since ita been open more than month and I don't like it.
MLF mentioned during the combine that a wide receiver coach will be hired before the start of the season. I don't feel the need to be worried about it.
Of course they're going to hire a WR coach. I mean, does that even need to be said? Who even asked LaFleur that? Idiotic.
There are teams in the NFL that don't have a coach solely designated as wide receivers coach.
Do they have somebody who coaches the WR's? Yes, they do.
This isn't difficult.
The team has named Butch Barry senior analyst and promoted Luke Getsy to quarterbacks/passing game coordinator and Jason Vrable to wide receivers coach.
The Packers have announced the following coaching staff changes:
The team has named Butch Barry senior analyst and promoted Luke Getsy to quarterbacks/passing game coordinator and Jason Vrable to wide receivers coach.
As a Miami Hurricane fan, I just want to point out that Butch Barry sucked.