Gute said today they won't be bringing in any vets.
Any ideas? I don't mean that critically. I'm curious. If it's a guy who figures to be a roster cut, I'd think it would make more sense to wait for that to happen.
Surprised a bit by this. Not just in the fact that he isn't thinking about it, but that he would say it publicly. Maybe just a GM's way of showing confidence in his own guys?
Was about to post this article, before I read your post. DON'T SHOOT ME CAPTAIN!
https://packerswire.usatoday.com/20...c-reid-could-help-solve-packers-new-problems/
Even if they were to like the idea of a trade (and I honestly don't think that will happen), it makes more sense to wait until preseason tape is out there and they have a better idea of who they'd spend some capital on.
It was found out through X-rays that Brice didn’t have a break. He was on the sidelines in today’s practice without a boot, sounded like he was walking on it but favoring his other leg.
This is really promising news
Now let’s go get Reid!![]()
Not really sure about that?I assume they tested for an ACL tear then?
It was found out through X-rays that Brice didn’t have a break. He was on the sidelines in today’s practice without a boot, sounded like he was walking on it but favoring his other leg.
This is really promising news
Now let’s go get Reid!![]()
The only thing he cant stand.. are green peas and racial inequality.So what you are saying is....Brice can stand for the Anthem?![]()
It was found out through X-rays that Brice didn’t have a break. He was on the sidelines in today’s practice without a boot, sounded like he was walking on it but favoring his other leg.
This is really promising news
Now let’s go get Reid!![]()
Not to even mention, you have lost the one proven capable starter/backup that is currently on the roster.
"Started" sure, but I'm guessing only in base defense, which isn't really the base defense anymore. I don't think he was going to be on the field for sub packages.
However, silver lining or not, the loss of Ryan at what I already considered a position thin in talent, should be compensated for by signing someone with some NFL experience.
NaVorro Bowman or Gerald Hodges would be the logical available FA's that are available.
Obviously, if Burks or one of the other guys is looking spectacular, the Packers aren't worried. Or if someone on the outside can replace Matthews, Clay can always be brought into the inside again.
I agree on Superbowl, but I think if we keep Kizer we can make the playoffs if Aaron breaks a 4th body part.
I think we might see Burks and Martini split the job. One plays run, one plays pass. Based on seeing Martini at Notre Dame, I hope Burks can cover the running game.
Was about to post this article, before I read your post. DON'T SHOOT ME CAPTAIN!
https://packerswire.usatoday.com/20...c-reid-could-help-solve-packers-new-problems/
While I don't know the exact ins and outs of it, I think he would be subject to the waiver wire and that means other teams can grab him before the Packers.
Packers should offer the bears that 1st round pick from N.O. for Roquan Smith.
The only thing he cant stand.. are green peas and racial inequality.
Jake Ryan suffered torn ACL during Monday's practice, he's out for the season.
Every team has injuries. In case anybody missed it, the Eagles won the Superbowl with their backup QB .
They beat the Queens to advance (also with a backup QB). Underachievers ***** about injuries
his problem is that guarantee clause. wave it and be done.The Packers definitely shouldn't think about acquiring a rookie holding out in this day and age.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think the main difference is that those teams didnt have a big salary invested into their QB, they spend on fielding a good team top to bottom that’s capable of carrying a game manager. We got a lot of cap tied into Rodgers so maybe a few more positions are not as good or deep as they could be so we need the guys there to perform and not get injured. It’s the parity part of the nfl.
his problem is that guarantee clause. wave it and be done.
no, they don't. However, they do have ways to free up cap money, cutting Bulaga for one. Also, when I talk about signing "this FA or that FA" I do realize that they can't sign them all, but merely pointing out ways that the current roster can be improved with guys that are available to sign.Once again, unfortunately the Packers don't have enough cap space to sign a veteran at inside linebacker, wide receiver, edge rusher and other positions you have suggested to bring one in.
Thanks for the clarification. I knew at some point there was the FA cutoff aspect, that was Josh Sitton's path when cut. That being said, those waiting for a 4 year veteran player to be cut and signed by the Packers, still have to realize, it is that player's decision who he plays for at that point. So whether its via the waiver wire or the signing of a free agent, no guarantees the guy you may want becomes yours.A veteran who has four or more accrued seasons isn't subject to the waiver wire and becomes a free agent immediately allowed to sign with a team.
Gute said today they won't be bringing in any vets.