Which current player would you rather keep?

Riley82

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
62
Reaction score
3
Location
Rugby
Which Player would you rather keep between Spriggs,Bell,Brice Fackrell and Kizer.
Who is more useful.
 

Dantés

Gute Loot
Joined
Jan 21, 2017
Messages
12,116
Reaction score
3,036
I would rather keep Kizer, as he carries the possibility of turning into a high value commodity. I don’t really think the others can play.
 
H

HardRightEdge

Guest
If you mean right now I'd say Spriggs because if Bulaga cannot play, or if he plays and gets injured again, there really isn't anybody else. As inconsistent as Spriggs has been, I think Bell or Murphy off the PS would be worse at RT.

If you mean for next year, assuming they keep playing the way they have in their careers to date, which with these guys is a likelihood, I don't really care much one way or the other. Put a gun to my head and I'd say Spriggs, but he hasn't shown much progress so his upside is probably close to capped.
 
D

Deleted member 6794

Guest
As inconsistent as Spriggs has been, I think Bell or Murphy off the PS would be worse at RT.

FWIW the Packers have placed Kyle Murphy on injured reserve. Adam Pankey is the only player on the practice squad who might be able to play tackle.
 

PikeBadger

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
6,686
Reaction score
1,971
I’d keep Spriggs. It could possibly be that his career track is similar to what T.J. Lang’s was.
 

Dantés

Gute Loot
Joined
Jan 21, 2017
Messages
12,116
Reaction score
3,036
Alex Light would be the next man up at OT if they needed someone beyond Spriggs.
 

LambeauLombardi

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
782
Reaction score
99
1. Bell 2. Kizer 3. Spriggs (3-5 on my list is where I don't care if Green Bay wants cut them) 4. Fackrell (Only here because Brice is the worst player I've seen in 21 years) 5.Brice

I didn't watch any of Dallas last year but everything I heard Bell was ok for them last year. Did something change this year?

Kizer still sucks but about 40% of the time you think to yourself if this guy is smarter with the ball he can be decent.

Not going to be shocked if Rodgers season ends Spriggs will be the reason why.

I’d keep Spriggs. It could possibly be that his career track is similar to what T.J. Lang’s was.

Not a terrible comparison, but I don't remember TJ sucking this bad in year 3 (2011).

If you mean right now I'd say Spriggs because if Bulaga cannot play, or if he plays and gets injured again, there really isn't anybody else. As inconsistent as Spriggs has been, I think Bell or Murphy off the PS would be worse at RT.

I thought Bell was going to be decent, at least from what I heard he was supposed to be ok. Would Spriggs be better off at RG and Bell at RT? But given the choice, I think I'd rather have Bell start at RT over Spriggs.
 

azrsx05

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
610
Reaction score
77
None of them They all stuck. Would be better trying to find better talent elsewhere.
 

gopkrs

Cheesehead
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
5,717
Reaction score
1,438
I'm hoping Brice turns it around. All he has to do is find the ball and his teammate. So Brice.
 
D

Deleted member 6794

Guest
I didn't watch any of Dallas last year but everything I heard Bell was ok for them last year. Did something change this year?

Bell struggled mightily in pass protection last season allowing a total of 20 pressures on only 144 snaps while playing left tackle for the Cowboys. With him starting in place of McCray today you have to realize that he has only lined up at right guard for a total of 69 snaps during his career, with the majority of those coming in 2012.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
15,896
Reaction score
6,821
I guess I’m still gun shy picking a backup QB like Kyser after Hundley disappointed last year. However a backup QB can have a profound impact as we’ve seen recently around the league. With just 1 year of experience I’m not ready to rule Kizer a lost cause just yet, he may be ready to make that performance leap to “serviceable” this year. We’re not the only team who’s thorough evaluation merited giving Kizer a run around the track.
I’m not seeing enough progression from the candidates in question to think I’m going to really miss the others.. I’d take Kizer because we don’t really have much of an option behind him.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.
Top