FrankRizzo
Cheesehead
Negative.Should we cut Rodgers and get Tim Tebow ???
But would you have rather run a QB-sneak on that 4th & inches play with Tebow?
I can't think of a better play than that. Seriously. Tebow is gold on that.
Negative.Should we cut Rodgers and get Tim Tebow ???
There definately seemed to be some sort of breakdown between the coach and Rodgers today. I know the cameras pick everything up but that was definately a heated exchange between the two.His QB rating was around 60 I Think. 50-50 on him and Mike as the cause.
If we want to go 1-15.Should we cut Rodgers and get Tim Tebow ???
Negative.
But would you have rather run a QB-sneak on that 4th & inches play with Tebow?
I can't think of a better play than that. Seriously. Tebow is gold on that.
Negative.
But would you have rather run a QB-sneak on that 4th & inches play with Tebow?
I can't think of a better play than that. Seriously. Tebow is gold on that.
Why not?I don't think you can pin this on Rodgers for the last drive..
You guys got beat.Anytime you give up more than 30 points to the other team you are likely to lose. No matter who the QB is.
Coming from an 0-3 team.Anytime you give up more than 30 points to the other team you are likely to lose. No matter who the QB is.
Don't look at the Browns as easy pickings. They have a good defense. And Hoyer seemed to give them some spark. Packer O-line will need to step up.You guys got beat.
At home.
By the Browns.
Here. Want some fresh and hot Humble Pie?
It's quite tasty.
Well, in the last 10 years the Packers are 9-29 when their opponent scores 30 points or more. And it is the reason the Vikings are 0-3. They are giving up 32 points a game.Coming from an 0-3 team.![]()
I'm pretty pissed off at the Packers offense and play calling in this game. We have our on set of warts to be corrected. But I still like our chances going forward over the Queens. We'll see how this all turns out in the end but I doubt we would be 0-3 playing your schedule to date.Anytime you give up more than 30 points to the other team you are likely to lose. No matter who the QB is.
Yes we can bounce back. We usually do.We didn't lose the game on the final drive. We should have capitalized on the turnovers in Q2. Moreover those two interceptions and the fumbles cost us big time. Sure this wasn't Rodgers best game. He missed some open guys today an the second interception was a stupid mistake (the first was on Jones though). But blaming him for not being good enough in the clutch situations is ********.
Losing sucks, especially if you lose due to stupid mistakes. Time to move on, get healthy, stop making mistakes, start winning games, and make the play-offs. Than I my opinion this team can beat all the top teams on a good day (a day without stupid turnovers, that is).
Why not, exactly?But blaming him for not being good enough in the clutch situations is ********.
His QB rating was around 60 I Think. 50-50 on him and Mike as the cause.
Yes there were OL breakdowns but it's a big guy league and Rodgers has dealt with the same far better than he did in today's game. He didn't step up. Did you see the conversation between him and MM on the sidelines? You can't couch this in anything but a poor performance by Rodgers (and MM).The line as well he was hit many times.....he had not a lot of time.
Checked on that. Since 1990. Only three have made it to the playoffs. Not a good sign.We'll beat the Browns. Check back here.
btw has an 0-3 team ever made the playoffs? Your percentages are going down.![]()
Our defense performed well with a number of takeaways today. Any defense will have moments where they break. Our offense had performed well up until today and wasn't it's usual self. But on balance through the first three games I'll take the Packers team overall compared to the Vikings. I tend to believe we would have a better record given the fact we had played the same opponent's.Not sure. But if the defense doesn't start stopping the other team from scoring in the last 4 minutes it matters not. That's twice in the last two weeks they had a lead and let it slip away. Of course over at the Vikings board it's all about Ponder and not the defense. You can't give up 32 points a game and expect to win. Not looking good for my team right now.
Our defense performed well with a number of takeaways today. Any defense will have moments where they break. Our offense had performed well up until today and wasn't it's usual self. But on balance through the first three games I'll take the Packers team overall compared to the Vikings. I tend to believe we would have a better record given the fact we had played the same opponent's.
How many of those points can exactly be contributed to the defense? Was it the defense that allowed Ross to screw up? How many of the points today came at the hands of the defense? The first 13 for sure! The defense put the Packers in good field position how may times today and we came away with field goals or $hit on the arm of AR.Our D has given up 88 points in 3 games ...... you can't give up an average of 30 a game and expect to win. Of equal note you should not score an average 32 points per game and be 1 -2.......
Well, in the last 10 years the Packers are 9-29 when their opponent scores 30 points or more. And it is the reason the Vikings are 0-3. They are giving up 32 points a game.