He came in and made RG3 look substandard quickly. You can’t look at his stats behind a substandard O line the last several years and say he’s not good.
If Cousins needs a better O-Line to be a winner then he may have gone to the wrong place:
https://www.profootballfocus.com/ne...ine-rankings-all-32-teams-units-entering-2018
According to this link:
- Keenum was the 3rd. most pressured QB last season and he's a lot more mobile than Cousins.
- Vikings O-Line ranked 22nd. in 2017.
- Vikings O-Line is projected 28th. for 2018.
- PFF notes injuries "ravaged" Washington's O-Line last season but noted they were highly graded in previous years.
And in case anybody missed it, Minnesota's O-Line coach Tony Sparano died suddenly and unexpectedly on Sunday.
The people who know Cousins best let him go, something that does not happen with a 29 year old "franchise" QB. Minnesota is paying him $84 mil guaranteed over 3 years. Instead, Washington has committed $60 mil in cap to Smith over the next 3 seasons, with dead cap numbers such that he's all but guaranteed he'll play out at least those 3 season. This is not a money move for Washington. If they thought Cousins was a true franchise guy they could have come up with another $8 mil per year in cap. It may be worth noting that Smith is the more mobile QB despite his age, a characteristic increasingly prized in QBs, not to run the ball but make plays when protection breaks down. Cousins is not that guy.
Is Cousins a bad QB? Clearly not. Is a $28 mil per year winning QB? That's a long shot and that will depend primarily on continuing defensive strength. He might be a good fantasy player in a league that doesn't consider sacks, fumbles or picks. He will not carry this team.
If their O-Line ends up in that 22nd. - 28th. rank range, the Vikings would have been better off with either Keenum or Smith.