PackerLegend
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2006
- Messages
- 1,947
- Reaction score
- 0
I saw on the news a lil while ago and it said that espn reported that the pack are making a push to sign Arrington.
smlutz said:I'm from Pennsylvania, and know a good bit about Leaping Lavar. The man is a hell of an athlete, he has always been a dynamic force to be reckoned with, however, the problem is this: In the incorrect system, he is constantly getting burnt. After talking to people we have determined that the correct system to use Arrington is has got to be the 3-4, to use him similar to the way the Steelers use Porter. He could be a gem, but we run the 4-3, not sure how they would blend.
Regardless, I think signing him would improve our defense. Which is what we need right now.
smlutz said:I'm from Pennsylvania, and know a good bit about Leaping Lavar. The man is a hell of an athlete, he has always been a dynamic force to be reckoned with, however, the problem is this: In the incorrect system, he is constantly getting burnt. After talking to people we have determined that the correct system to use Arrington is has got to be the 3-4, to use him similar to the way the Steelers use Porter. He could be a gem, but we run the 4-3, not sure how they would blend.
Regardless, I think signing him would improve our defense. Which is what we need right now.
LambeauEast said:I hear what everyone is saying about not believing it till they see it, but what a pickup Arrington would be. Then maybe even swing Woodson in, and then draft either Mario or A.J, and the Packers "D" is looking pretty potent (on paper).
KGB/Pickett/Jenkins/Kamp or Mario/Pickett/Jenkins/Kamp
Arrington/Barnett/Hawk or Arrington/Barnett/Taylor
Collins/Harris/Woodson/Manuel
Not too shabby...
The coolest thing about this report though is the fact that LA thought it went well enough that he wants to talk to Brett. I can hear it now..."Hey Brett, man...it's LaVar. Sorry about that whole leg injury thing a few years back, but that's not why I called. Listen, why don't you get your butt in here, because I'm going to sign here and my agents are going to get Woodson in too. Now I know we're no Reggie White, but I think we could get this done...whataya say?"
Packman5 said:where are you guys getting all this info from? i've been trying to find it but i can't.
pyledriver80 said:Harris,Plummer at CB with Barnett,Arrington,Davis at LB
OR
Harris,Woodson at Corner with Barnett, Hawk, Davis at LB.
I tend to go with the 2nd one myself
Packersfan43084 said:If we do in fact sign him, I don't think we'll draft Hawk since we already signed Ben Taylor (who played well last year.) I say sign Arrington, draft Williams if he is there, if not, trade down and draft a CB.