pyledriver80 said:
Honestly fromwhat I have read Moll may be the best at the actual "block phase' of this system.
Pretty funny Zero considering you just quoted this. Sorry you can't figure it out.
This is what you said.
Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 8:04 am
pyledriver80 said:
Honestly fromwhat I have read Moll may be the best at the actual "block phase' of this system. I know everybody wants to paint a rosey picture and I wish I could feel as confident as some of you but I just don't see it. I have nightmares thinking about a zone-blocking scheme getting blown up. It's very ugly.
From what you READ, not what you THOUGHT or STATED yourself.
Again, I ask. Where did you say specifically that Moll was going to better than the other two?
When I was looking for Moll comments, I was initially trying to prove you RIGHT, but found the opposite. That's not my fault. So don't be all salty toward me bubba. I didn't make those comments with your keyboard, YOU did.
And really, we don't even know WHICH one is the best. You can't slam Colledge for having a bad game, then praise Moll for having a good game. Isn't that what our complaint on Jon Ryan is? Inconsistency.
Let's see who comes to play during the real games with real starters going against them for a full 60 minutes. Then we can boast about who said what and vice versa.