Packers + Mo Wilk working on 1 year deal

C-Lee · Mar 12, 2019

https://twitter.com/joearrigo/status/1105529232396939264

AmishMafia · Mar 12, 2019

Pleased at first but the source has no credibility.

Snoops · Mar 12, 2019

AmishMafia said:
Pleased at first but the source has no credibility.

Actually he was the one that announced the Wilkerson signing last yr..

GleefulGary · Mar 12, 2019

Love it.

Sunshinepacker · Mar 12, 2019

I would be all for this. He was playing pretty well, not elite but pretty well, prior to his injury. He'd make a great stop-gap to help the team groom hopeful #12 draft pick Ed Oliver....sorry, i'm being greedy but a pass rush with Mr & Mr Smith, Clark, and Oliver would be AMAZING.

metallicblaze · Mar 12, 2019

1 year deal with incentives. Can't go wrong.

Do7 · Mar 12, 2019

Honestly it was around the time when he went down when the pass rush began to decline. Hopefully he can stay healthy this time around.

Pokerbrat2000 · Mar 12, 2019

Patiently waiting on news about Breeland and Wilkerson

You must be logged in to see this image or video!

sschind · Mar 12, 2019

Sunshinepacker said:
I would be all for this. He was playing pretty well, not elite but pretty well, prior to his injury. He'd make a great stop-gap to help the team groom hopeful #12 draft pick Ed Oliver....sorry, i'm being greedy but a pass rush with Mr & Mr Smith, Clark, and Oliver would be AMAZING.

If you were being Greedy we would have another CB on our roster and not another pass rusher

Honestly if we took another pass rusher at #12 I wouldn't mind at all since we still would have several picks to shore up the offense. I wouldn't be so keen on trading a few of those picks to move up to get another pass rusher though because it would limit our ability to get the help on offense that we need.

For example if Oliver is the guy you say he is fine, we get him at 12 take a OL at 30 a TE at 44 and a WR at 75 or some combination like that. if we trade two of those picks to move up yeah we get a better pass rusher but now we only have 1 pick (likely not #30 for sure) to help the offense.

rodell330 · Mar 12, 2019

Wilkerson would be a welcomed addition back. I fear Breeland is gonna want to much. Somebody like DRC would be a great cheap signing if we’re looking for more corner depth.

GleefulGary · Mar 12, 2019

rodell330 said:
Wilkerson would be a welcomed addition back. I fear Breeland is gonna want to much. Somebody like DRC would be a great cheap signing if we’re looking for more corner depth.

The guy who quit on his team halfway through the year?

Sounds great.

tynimiller · Mar 12, 2019

rodell330 said:
Wilkerson would be a welcomed addition back. I fear Breeland is gonna want to much. Somebody like DRC would be a great cheap signing if we’re looking for more corner depth.

I'd sign DRC just to fire him...quit on a team you should never get a job again.

brandon2348 · Mar 12, 2019

This would be great.

OldSchool101 · Mar 12, 2019

I’d love this. Then we can hit our OL and get a receiving threat. I’d trade back into the teens if possible.
Then consolidate some of the 11 players and move up several times to consolidate the draft field back to 8-9 players.

GreenBaySlacker · Mar 12, 2019

Modog on the comeback. Effyea.

rodell330 · Mar 13, 2019

JanisJubilee said:
The guy who quit on his team halfway through the year?

Sounds great.

You have the facts in that? Or you’re just assuming that?

GleefulGary · Mar 13, 2019

rodell330 said:
You have the facts in that? Or you’re just assuming that?

He retired halfway through the year after a game where he didn't play. Call it what you want, I don't want a guy like that here.

Dantés · Mar 13, 2019

I don't really think one year deals make a lot of sense for the Packers right now. I don't think they're legit SB contenders in Petals' first season. If his scheme takes hold and the roster additions prove sound, I would consider them back in contention for 2020 and on to the end of Rodgers' effectiveness.

Mondio · Mar 13, 2019

Dantés said:
I don't really think one year deals make a lot of sense for the Packers right now. I don't think they're legit SB contenders in Petals' first season. If his scheme takes hold and the roster additions prove sound, I would consider them back in contention for 2020 and on to the end of Rodgers' effectiveness.

Generally I agree. The only reason I'd make an exception for Mo is familiarity and he's not going to cost a lot. I'd be ok with it for 2 reasons, he'd provide a bridge from this year to next and let a younger draft class develop while still giving us quality play (we hope) Or they want to see how he does, and he could be a 2 year extension after that for us. He's getting to that age though that everyone frets about, and he's a big man with a couple injuries under his belt so I'm not leaning this way.

But with all the moves yesterday, it's apparent they're trying to win now and later with their signings. a 1 year deal doesn't seem to fit, but with losing Daniels likely next year, we'll be drafting 1-2 DL this year and they'd like to need them for spots and development rather than starting, so Mo fills a role for a year. The biggest factor though is cost, and his won't be like signing Houston or something. I think he'd be cheap.

Pokerbrat2000 · Mar 13, 2019

I'm not sure I would view Mo Wilkerson as just a one year signing. While his contract would no doubt end up being just that, I think the guy still has a lot of football left in him. Don't bring him back this season, you probably lost him for good. All that said, if the Packers are confident that their current DL players and a draft pick or 2 are adequate, no need to bring him back.

Deleted member 6794 · Mar 14, 2019

I would definitely like the Packers to re-sign Wilkerson. With limited cap space available this season it might be smart to sign him to a reasonable two-year contract.

rodell330 said:
You have the facts in that? Or you’re just assuming that?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...ue-rodgerscromartie-retiring-after-11-seasons

GreenBaySlacker · Mar 14, 2019

Pokerbrat2000 said:
I'm not sure I would view Mo Wilkerson as just a one year signing. While his contract would no doubt end up being just that, I think the guy still has a lot of football left in him. Don't bring him back this season, you probably lost him for good. All that said, if the Packers are confident that their current DL players and a draft pick or 2 are adequate, no need to bring him back.

I remember when the giants had the best D line in the league.....and then they drafted piere-paul. And then they won a super bowl again. Or two with him. I can't remember exactly. But I do remember thinking they are idiots for drafting another dlineman to apparently sit on the bench. Because their starting 4 was all studs..... Annnd I was wrong......

Modog will be a great addition no matter what. Imo.
And I would Definately still spend a 1st on another dlineman.

AyBee04 · Mar 14, 2019

C-Lee said:
https://twitter.com/joearrigo/status/1105529232396939264

In that case I'll help take the pack back to the super bowl as a psychological consultant/ coordinator or creative weekly disciplines. Love the pack so much I'd do it for room and board even with my bachelors in psychology.

El Guapo · Mar 14, 2019

Is Johnny Jolly still available to help us out?

AyBee04 · Mar 14, 2019

El Guapo said:
Is Johnny Jolly still available to help us out?

Ask az state, they got enough purp for er one.

Packers + Mo Wilk working on 1 year deal

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

GO PACK GO!

Pack

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Gute Loot

Cheesehead

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.

Deleted member 6794

Guest

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Cheesehead

Similar threads