Packers and Aaron Rodgers agree on 3 yr 150 mill

Status
Not open for further replies.

ARPackFan

Knock it off with them negative waves
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
725
Reaction score
262
Location
Arkansas
I highly doubt Rodgers will forgo $25 million of salary to help reduce his cap hit for next season. I'm convinced that most of the base salary he was set to earn was converted into a signing bonus for the Packers to create much needed cap space though.

Your opinion may be a 100% accurate but I am not believing anything that I read or hear until the contract is signed. I do believe there is a reason why Rodgers has not signed his contract yet. Maybe he's helping Davante or waiting to see what moves the Packers make.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,596
Reaction score
8,860
Location
Madison, WI
Your opinion may be a 100% accurate but I am not believing anything that I read or hear until the contract is signed. I do believe there is a reason why Rodgers has not signed his contract yet. Maybe he's helping Davante or waiting to see what moves the Packers make.
Exactly.

Rodgers will have an "out" as well. He may have told the Packers he is waiting to sign, when the Packers ink a new deal with Davante. If that doesn't happen, Rodgers just goes public with it and states "Like I said, I had every intention to play for the Packers, but I have said it before, I won't play on a team in rebuild. The Packers failure to come to terms with the best WR in the NFL, forced me into rethinking my staying."
 

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
14,925
Reaction score
5,565
Exactly.

Rodgers will have an "out" as well. He may have told the Packers he is waiting to sign, when the Packers ink a new deal with Davante. If that doesn't happen, Rodgers just goes public with it and states "Like I said, I had every intention to play for the Packers, but I have said it before, I won't play on a team in rebuild. The Packers failure to come to terms with the best WR in the NFL, forced me into rethinking my staying."

That would sink the team, because then his full what $46M hits the 16th and we'd have to have MASSIVE cuts to clear that - Amos, Lowry, Lewis, Crosby, Cobb, Jenkins, Dillon all cut wouldn't even be enough saved if I ran numbers right in my head. Jaire extension I'm shocked hasn't been worked out yet and look for it to drop today or early tomorrow which would be massive.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,596
Reaction score
8,860
Location
Madison, WI
That would sink the team, because then his full what $46M hits the 16th and we'd have to have MASSIVE cuts to clear that - Amos, Lowry, Lewis, Crosby, Cobb, Jenkins, Dillon all cut wouldn't even be enough saved if I ran numbers right in my head. Jaire extension I'm shocked hasn't been worked out yet and look for it to drop today or early tomorrow which would be massive.
Yup, like you and I both said a week or 2 ago, The Rodgers Decision decides the direction the Packers go. That decision really isn't final, until he signs on the dotted line. Problem is, the Packers have already been forced into making all their decisions, based on the assumption that Rodgers is back. Somewhere, Rodgers is smiling like a Cheshire cat.
 

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
14,925
Reaction score
5,565
Yup, like you and I both said a week or 2 ago, The Rodgers Decision decides the direction the Packers go. That decision really isn't final, until he signs on the dotted line. Problem is, the Packers have already been forced into making all their decisions, based on the assumption that Rodgers is back. Somewhere, Rodgers is smiling like a Cheshire cat.

However, I concede that none of the moves that have been done are so destructive cap wise in the future that would make it impossible to build around Love....it for sure could impact how this is conducted, but nothing yet has crossed that line for me personally.

I will at the same time concede the Preston extension depending on structure could be argued you don't do if Love is the present. You strip things down more...and not extend him.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,596
Reaction score
8,860
Location
Madison, WI
I will at the same time concede the Preston extension depending on structure could be argued you don't do if Love is the present. You strip things down more...and not extend him.
Yup.

I can guarantee you that Gute and the Packers would be approaching the off season differently if Rodgers had said he is retiring or wants to be traded. Doesn't just include our own players, but who and how they might be approaching Free Agents during the 2 days before Free Agency.
 

Pkrjones

Cheesehead
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
4,057
Reaction score
1,927
Location
Northern IL
Yup, like you and I both said a week or 2 ago, The Rodgers Decision decides the direction the Packers go. That decision really isn't final, until he signs on the dotted line.
This is 100% my speculation, I have no insider at 1265 but am reading between the lines. IF AR is waiting to sign any extension until Davante is extended then hopefully Gute has plan B ready to pull the trigger. Plan B would be trading Adams' rights to another team AND AR to Pittsburgh or Seattle?

The Packers MUST be under the cap by Wed. at 3pm cdt, so ALL of the pieces must be in place, starting with AR. If AR is dragging his heels bullying Gute into a bad Adams deal then jettisoning both may be necessary.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,596
Reaction score
8,860
Location
Madison, WI
This is 100% my speculation, I have no insider at 1265 but am reading between the lines. IF AR is waiting to sign any extension until Davante is extended then hopefully Gute has plan B ready to pull the trigger. Plan B would be trading Adams' rights to another team AND AR to Pittsburgh or Seattle?

The Packers MUST be under the cap by Wed. at 3pm cdt, so ALL of the pieces must be in place, starting with AR. If AR is dragging his heels bullying Gute into a bad Adams deal then jettisoning both may be necessary.
Yup....as I said, these 2 players hold all of the cards of both of them staying in GB. Ironic if Rodgers is only staying in GB for a shot at a SB and he just might be holding things up, where the Packers really can't put a team together to do that.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,596
Reaction score
8,860
Location
Madison, WI
Let's just hope that if the Packers trade Rodgers to the Steelers, one of the Players in the deal is TJ Watt. :)

Nevermind.....Holy Schniekies! I just looked at Watt's contract.

 

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
14,925
Reaction score
5,565
Let's just hope that if the Packers trade Rodgers to the Steelers, one of the Players in the deal is TJ Watt. :)

Nevermind.....Holy Schniekies! I just looked at Watt's contract.


TJ Watt is going to go the route of Von Miller IMO after this season - will win a ring with a different team.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,596
Reaction score
8,860
Location
Madison, WI
TJ Watt is going to go the route of Von Miller IMO after this season - will win a ring with a different team.
Something the Packers are quite familiar with might prevent that. He would have a cap hit of $41.35M after this next season. Sure they can split that over 2 years, but that is a big hit.
 

Dantés

Gute Loot
Joined
Jan 21, 2017
Messages
12,116
Reaction score
3,036
This is just speculation, but it's possible that the delay is also on the Packers end. They might want to structure the contract differently depending on what happens with their free agents.
 

Mondio

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,893
Reaction score
3,797
This is just speculation, but it's possible that the delay is also on the Packers end. They might want to structure the contract differently depending on what happens with their free agents.
The only allowable speculation is that It's because Rodgers is a ***** and management is inept.
 

Firethorn1001

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
1,701
Reaction score
1,252
All I know is that Rodgers better be extended. Because if he walks out the door next year as a free agent and the Packers just let 1st round picks walk out the door just to have one more year, someone should be fired. I think that is the worst case scenario. I'd rather have multiple draft picks than even just 1 more year of Rodgers.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,596
Reaction score
8,860
Location
Madison, WI
All I know is that Rodgers better be extended. Because if he walks out the door next year as a free agent and the Packers just let 1st round picks walk out the door just to have one more year, someone should be fired. I think that is the worst case scenario. I'd rather have multiple draft picks than even just 1 more year of Rodgers.
Maybe the Seahawks will give us 1 of the first rounders they got from Denver for him. ;)
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
15,782
Reaction score
6,746
Your opinion may be a 100% accurate but I am not believing anything that I read or hear until the contract is signed. I do believe there is a reason why Rodgers has not signed his contract yet. Maybe he's helping Davante or waiting to see what moves the Packers make.
There’s not even a question in my mind that we are working Rodgers contract to positively supply our Cap dilemma. How they work the details we don’t know just yet. However the bigger the contract and the firmer the team commitment to a particular player like Rodgers? I agree that part leads to the bigger the long term capital gymnastics we make.

We have to get Rodgers contract right. There’s too much on the line now. I’m beginning to think that maybe, just maybe, it’s the Packers FO working it backwards. I think they needed a firm commitment from Aaron and now they have it. Our FO also likely understands how much $$ they’ll need to scrape from Aaron’s deal, but they may not want to overdue it (the future pushing of cap monies)

I don’t think it’s Aaron holding the shoe anymore as much, he’s gotten his assurances he’s getting paid. Aaron is working with us this go around (to formulate a winning hand) and I think it’s a positive sign of his growth.
 
OP
OP
PackAttack12

PackAttack12

R-E-L-A-X
Joined
Sep 16, 2016
Messages
6,500
Reaction score
2,157
You must be logged in to see this image or video!

His cap number for 2022 is supposedly down to 28 million.

Comes with 2 “dummy” years.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,596
Reaction score
8,860
Location
Madison, WI
So what I am curious about, this article says that the Packers are now only a few million over the cap, is Davante's tag number not included in it? Because if it is and they can work out a new deal with him, they will have a lot more cap space. I am under the assumption that it isn't.
 

bigbubbatd

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
1,679
Reaction score
166
So what I am curious about, this article says that the Packers are now only a few million over the cap, is Davante's tag number not included in it? Because if it is and they can work out a new deal with him, they will have a lot more cap space. I am under the assumption that it isn't.
Devante is included from what I know. The Packers could get well under the cap with a devante extension and an Alexander extension
 

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
14,925
Reaction score
5,565
So what I am curious about, this article says that the Packers are now only a few million over the cap, is Davante's tag number not included in it? Because if it is and they can work out a new deal with him, they will have a lot more cap space. I am under the assumption that it isn't.

It's included on Spotrac and they've been very much on top of things past couple days - OTC has been very off lately I've noticed. If Rodgers move saves us $18M - Spotrac also shows about $2M yet to gain - which Cobb told folks he was reworking his deal and should easily make that up.

Notice the big fish out there is still an extension for Jaire which could save as much as 5-8M.
 

PikeBadger

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
6,682
Reaction score
1,967
However, I concede that none of the moves that have been done are so destructive cap wise in the future that would make it impossible to build around Love....it for sure could impact how this is conducted, but nothing yet has crossed that line for me personally.

I will at the same time concede the Preston extension depending on structure could be argued you don't do if Love is the present. You strip things down more...and not extend him.
Kind of disagree with you about P.Smiith. If Love is the QB the team will be relying on a very strong defense and powerful running game and play much more of the field position game imo. I'd enjoy seeing that after all the pass happy years under Rodgers. It wouldn't bother me at all to play more like the Steelers, 49ers and Titans.
 

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
14,925
Reaction score
5,565
Kind of disagree with you about P.Smiith. If Love is the QB the team will be relying on a very strong defense and powerful running game and play much more of the field position game imo. I'd enjoy seeing that after all the pass happy years under Rodgers. It wouldn't bother me at all to play more like the Steelers, 49ers and Titans.

I will admit that post was before seeing the structure of Preston's deal - it is such a team friendly deal I fully support it either way. My initial struggle was solely based on the length of the contract running into ages where we see a drop off at his position often - and paying aging/depleting defensive players when defense will be critical if going to the Love era isn't the smartest thing.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,596
Reaction score
8,860
Location
Madison, WI
Devante is included from what I know. The Packers could get well under the cap with a devante extension and an Alexander extension
Get those 2 things done and we have enough to sign Jarvis Landry and a decent D-lineman. :coffee:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Top