Highest player isn't always best pick. Many times it's contingent on what your scouts/draft room mocks up that other GM's are doing too.
There were 10-15 players with better/similar impact that fit a real TANGIBLE need that have everything but this guy's ceiling.
Like Harrell, this is a "everything points to this guy being good, but..." Pick.
So best player available isn't the way to go? Unless you are going to argue that the highest rated is not the same as the best player.
I'd be willing to bet Gute didn't have 10-15 players with better or similar impact ratings. You will forgive me if I take his opinion over yours or anyone elses on here for that matter..
Before you get on me about BPA vs need I suggest you do a search for some of my other posts on the subject. I think you will find my views align a lot closer to yours than my comment, which was made half in jest to poke fun at the strict BPA crowd, would suggest.