lambeaulambo
Cheesehead
This is nice.
Well Rodgers did punish the Packers. That can not be disputed. At the start of the draft, he created a massive controversy and did nothing to stop it until he showed up for training camp. Has he had a great season, of course.I really don't understand the guy's criticism (in part) being "He punished his team" or whatever it was. You mean...the team that has the best record in the league and has locked up a #1 seed...? Would love to see how things would be going if Rodgers hadn't been such a jerk!
Packers coach Matt LaFleur shared his thoughts with reporters Wednesday.
“I don’t know what else could factor into it other than how someone performs on a weekly basis,” LaFleur said. “If people are going to judge people for differences of opinion or things that they have no idea what the heck they are talking about, then I think that kind of discredits that award. We hold that award in high regard.
“And I think it’s an absolute privilege to be able to vote for that award. To consider anything else, outside of what you see when that player is out there playing, I think is a disservice to everybody.”
i don't think he'll get it either, and i believe a significant part of the reason is they don't want to give it to the same person two years in a row. especially when they have an easy excuse to vote for a legendary qb that has 1,000 more yards and more tds. it is clear to me that rodgers is more important to the success of his team than brady is to the bucs, but a voter could legitimately make the case that brady has been more productive this season.Listening to the local guys talk this morning on the radio they think there are more out there like this Hub fellow. Some of them have had, and know others that have, votes MVP through the AP. A lot of it is based on popularity and not on the field performances. They don't think he is going to win it because of his hatred for the media and not getting the shots.
I believe most players of Rodgers stature have charitable causes on their resume. Probably even Antonio Brown and Donkey Kong Suh.The best part too is like....
Rodgers donated *millions* to charity and small businesses before this season during the pandemic (not to mention plenty of other charitable causes in the past like the 2018 Camp Fire relief, MACC, etc). This season alone we saw a guy driving drunk hit someone at 150mph and kill them. (and then another Raiders player arrested for DUI just days ago) We had Urban Meyer ditching his team after a game to go out to a club and get grinded on by some random girl. God only knows how many players with DUI or assault or domestic abuse charges. But yeah...biggest jerk in the league.
I agree. However, I bet if you dig deep into each player, you will see a different level of personal involvement with those charitable causes. There are probably guys just OK'ing a check to "Big Brothers and Sisters" because their accountant suggests it for tax reasons, but if asked, they might not have a clue as to what that Charity does. Then there are guys that are putting their physical selves behind their charitable work.I believe most players of Rodgers stature have charitable causes on their resume. Probably even Antonio Brown and Donkey Kong Suh.
I'd say that it probably is closer between Rodgers and Brady than the odds would indicate. Rodgers had a terrible game in Week 1. Brady had his terrible game late in the season, so there's recency bias against that.i don't think he'll get it either, and i believe a significant part of the reason is they don't want to give it to the same person two years in a row. especially when they have an easy excuse to vote for a legendary qb that has 1,000 more yards and more tds. it is clear to me that rodgers is more important to the success of his team than brady is to the bucs, but a voter could legitimately make the case that brady has been more productive this season.
If I could find the "winner" reaction emoji, I would plant it on this post.I don't really care who wins it, I just hope we win the Superbowl.