Do7
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2018
- Messages
- 2,141
- Reaction score
- 220
If this true, I hope The Raiders cut him, so we can bring him back. He should've never left in the first place imo.
With the Packers reportedly only willing to sign Jordy at around Vet. Minimum, it really wasn't Jordy who made the decision for him to leave.If this true, I hope The Raiders cut him, so we can bring him back. He should've never left in the first place imo.
If Cobb's injuries linger AND the Raiders cut him, I wouldn't mind Jordy back for the veteran minimum.
The good news is, if he's cut, no one will claim him. His cap number has not matched his production at all.
Yeah, Jordy's numbers before the fire sale started were a different story. Cobb is consistent with his inconsistency (one good game, one bad one, one game out with an injury, wash, rinse, repeat) while Jordy was steady whenever AR was under center. Cobb should have been sent packing and Jordy sat down to hammer out a more reasonable deal. Does anyone think the new guys are learning more sharing a locker room with Cobb than they would have with Jordy?
Also, the Raiders are a dumpster fire by design. Chucky signed a ten year deal so that he can get five to rebuild that whole disaster from the ground up. Anyone who thought otherwise should have gotten their wakeup call when they let Mack go. Jordy just had the misfortune (along with Cook) of being brought in under the old regime. That roster will likely see complete turnover in the next three years. Any veteran who sticks around for that situation is just collecting a pay check.
FYI, as a vested player (4 years of service) Nelson would not be subject to the waiver wire. He'd be an unrestircted free agent if cut. Nelson will not be playing again for the Packers unless there is a dire emergency and there's nobody better on the street.The good news is, if he's cut, no one will claim him. His cap number has not matched his production at all.
FYI, as a vested player (4 years of service) Nelson would not be subject to the waiver wire. He'd be an unrestircted free agent if cut. Nelson will not be playing again for the Packers unless there is a dire emergency and there's nobody better on the street.
I stand corrected.After the trade deadline, all players are subjected to waivers.
After the trade deadline, all players are subjected to waivers.
Not the most reliable source, but see here: https://www.ganggreennation.com/2018/8/31/17804144/how-nfl-waivers-work
Relevant text:
However, during the season, beginning immediately after the NFL trade deadline passes and continuing through the end of the regular season, vested veterans (players with four or more years of NFL service) are also subject to the waiver process.
While I can appreciate the Jordy love Fest, he's done. Has anybody followed in this year? Again, he's done. He was done last year. Letting him go was the right thing to do. Maybe it could have been handled better but it was the right move.
if we were real contenders you might want to think about trading a 7th for him (or picking him up if oak release their rights) but since we're not...
Yeah, Jordy's numbers before the fire sale started were a different story.
What baffles me is other than that game against Chicago, has Cobb really had another great game?
That irritated me also, for several reasons. I thought Cook had earned his place on the team, not only with his play in general, but for catching that pass at the end of the game, that helped us beat Dallas to advance to the NFCCG. Instead, Ted signed Martellus Bennett, who turned out to be not only not that good, but also a quitter. It's appropriate Ted lost his position the following offseason.But at the same time Jared Cook is balling out! I was mad we let him go!
While I can appreciate the Jordy love Fest, he's done. Has anybody followed in this year? Again, he's done. He was done last year. Letting him go was the right thing to do. Maybe it could have been handled better but it was the right move.
Idk about that jordys stat line is 25 catches for 353 yards 14.1 a catch and 3tds.
Jordy could still "retire", the Raiders could still cut him, and if anyone claims him, he stays retired. If no one claims him then the Packers could grab him as a FA. How to pull this off without a tampering or collusion accusation is the only tricky part. the rest is simple. The team that claimed him would need cap space if he "unretired" and a roster spot when they put in the claim. They'd only do that for spite and to prevent the Packers from getting him. Bears are lower on the waiver order FYI.After the trade deadline, all players are subjected to waivers.
Not the most reliable source, but see here: https://www.ganggreennation.com/2018/8/31/17804144/how-nfl-waivers-work
Relevant text:
However, during the season, beginning immediately after the NFL trade deadline passes and continuing through the end of the regular season, vested veterans (players with four or more years of NFL service) are also subject to the waiver process.
I stand corrected.
As a vested veteran, I don't know that Nelson can be on waivers.
lol...where's the slap myself in forehead emoji?With the trade deadline having passed there's no way to trade for another player.