LambeauLeaper said:
Wow, I'm obviously in the minority, but I don't think todays game was all Favre. Don't get me wrong he had a great game, but so did a lot of people. The pass protection was pretty damn stellar, and receivers were getting open all day. Favre was pressured, what, 3 times all game?? I wish people would be a little more even-keel when doling out criticism. When they lose it isn't all the QB's fault, and when they win it isn't all the QB's doing, either. Hell, the Packers won by 7, but nowhere do I see Carroll/Manuel's INT return for a TD mentioned. But it was ALL Favre? Come on people.
The reason why the Packers won was because of Brett Favre, plain and simple.
There was no running game to speak of, and the defense was horrendous, and if you had a lesser QB in there, you don't win the game.
The reason some people feel as if they have to defend Favre here is because there are fans here who like to blame Favre when the Pack loses because they think that he thinks he is bigger than the game, or the GB Packers, or TT..or all three.
No, it wasn't all Favre. His receivers had to catch the ball and make the plays.. But it's funny how he seems to receive all the blame when the Packers lose, but not all the credit when they win, like other QB's such as Peyton Manning and Tom Brady do.
By the way, how'd Tom Brady do last night, at home?