gopkrs
Cheesehead
- Joined
- May 12, 2014
- Messages
- 5,717
- Reaction score
- 1,438
Well, when you find your guy, you hire him. So it does not matter if someone else hires him later. I'm looking for a short Italian man.
Why bother, except, the man is a decent man, it would be kind to let him down easy.Can't find the quote online but the paper today mentions Philbin has not yet been contacted for an interview.
Please God don't go after any if these idiots recently fired. I'd actually say we can bring back MM to interview if we want to retred another, likely worse teams coach.
I think he was kind of already given his interview over the last 4 weeks? If the Packers have no intention of bringing him back, I actually think going through the motions of a formal interview are a waste of everyone's time and in the end they would just come off as perfunctory.Can't find the quote online but the paper today mentions Philbin has not yet been contacted for an interview.
You took the words right out of my mouth. Hard to find a guy that doesn't have some dings and dents on their resume, unless you risk hiring a guy that is perceived to be a young and upcoming coach, but then you are taking a chance on experience.Who wants retreads like Bill Belichick, Pete Carroll, and Andy Reid?
I wonder if some of the dozen aforementioned possible interviews are actually prep work for co-ordinators to help fill the staff for a certain "new to the nfl" college coach that has a game yet today and can't interview until tomorrow.
The young head coaches being fired today got their jobs because they were excellent coordinators. There is some excellent coordinator talent out there. I bet the GB job is the most attractive based on QB situation as well as the organization.Wouldn't surprise me. Guys like Caldwell and Pagano may not be the best choices for HC, but maybe Gute is casting out a large net and sorting through everyone, trying to assemble the best possible HC, OC and DC out of the group.
I am actually thinking that despite their most recent history of basically being the worst team in the NFL for years, the Cleveland job would be the most attractive. The amount of talent that they have been able to stock up on is incredible and if Baker Mayfield is a rising star, that job would seem to be super appealing to me. You have a city so hungry for a winning team, that even just making the playoffs the first year on the job, might make the new coach a legend in Cleveland.The young head coaches being fired today got their jobs because they were excellent coordinators. There is some excellent coordinator talent out there. I bet the GB job is the most attractive based on QB situation as well as the organization.
Fair enough.I am actually thinking that despite their most recent history of basically being the worst team in the NFL for years, the Cleveland job would be the most attractive. The amount of talent that they have been able to stock up on is incredible and if Baker Mayfield is a rising star, that job would seem to be super appealing to me. You have a city so hungry for a winning team, that even just making the playoffs the first year on the job, might make the new coach a legend in Cleveland.
Hate to say it, but I think potential HC's looking at the Packers job are going to be nervous that if all the perceived negatives about Rodgers are true, as well as a fan base that expects Super Bowls, taking the job could end up being a career death sentence.
Fair enough.
On the plus side, outside of Cincinnati, it's a very stable job. Who would want AZ job when they fire the HC after only a year?
Since 2000, 12 out of 19 Lombardi Trophies have been won by so called "retreads." If you're ruling out that whole category of coach, you're a fool. The Packers should look really hard at coaches who have done the job once and failed.
How many total coaches were retreads? If that group constituted a percentage lower than 63%, you might have a point.
"This is not shaping up to be a quick process."
How many total coaches were retreads? If that group constituted a percentage lower than 63%, you might have a point.
That odd perspective requires some explaining.Well, when you find your guy, you hire him. So it does not matter if someone else hires him later.
Well, if his contract carries guarantees into next season then there's no advantage in doing so with any haste. It would be a friendly thing to move quickly to give him more time to find a new job. The body is less than 24 hours cold. If this is the circumstance, and the Packers are committed to moving on, and they feel kindness toward Zook, we'll hear about it pretty soon.Why is Ron Zook not fired yet?
Only the at least mildly dyslexic could appreciate that.Can we stop calling these coaches retreads? My brain rearranges the letters to call them something much worse.
Hey, I never said he wasn't the right guy for the jobA few quotes from people in the nfl regarding Fitzgerald:
Total stud,” as one long-time NFL scout put it. “I would hire him in a minute. But he’s never leaving Northwestern.”
We better give him an interview just in case everybody else turns us down...Can't find the quote online but the paper today mentions Philbin has not yet been contacted for an interview.
Well, when you find your guy, you hire him. So it does not matter if someone else hires him later. I'm looking for a short Italian man.