TJV is right. There is no actual proof at this time; only circumstantial things that make someone wonder. It is interesting that the NFL lawyers have successfully, so far, argued that the NFL is not 32 sports teams competing for one prize, but one whole entertainment entity. Hmmmm....
Really? That’s what you think is evidence that games are fixed? NFL lawyers argue that the league is one entertainment entity to avoid the application of the Sherman Antitrust Act. What would happen if the NFL were deemed to be 32 individual entities competing for one prize? There couldn’t be a draft. The richest owners could throw as much money as they’d like at college players. The “top 20” players could sign with one team. There couldn’t be a salary cap. There would be no restrictions whatever on spending. Paul Allen could spend $500M or more in a single season if he choose to do so. The NFL couldn’t negotiate TV contracts, each team would make their own deal. Teams in small markets could get 1/10th of the TV money as teams in large markets - or less. Because if each team is an entity unto itself the current structure of the NFL would mean competitors are colluding with each other in the market place, a violation of antitrust laws. Within a short period of time, only the richest teams would be able to compete. The Packers would have zero chance of competing and would fold. The current NFL would be no more.
Hmmmm... Lucky for us, the Supreme Court has ruled on the current status of the NFL in
American Needle,
Inc.
v National Football League. They’re no doubt in on the conspiracy too, right?
Do they at this point? We don't know until someone is investigated and caught. But the FBI stopped investigating that stuff. Hmmmm. So to bring this all back around with what TJV will obviously think is an absurd notion; what if the 2 point decision was affected by something outside of the game itself? Evidence; none. Plausible; yes. We may never know.
That the FBI stopped investigating is evidence against your point of view, or is James Comey and several FBI agents part of the conspiracy, too? And you finish with what of course is an absurd/foolish notion. You are alleging that someone outside the game somehow communicated to McCarthy not to go for 2? Really? Then you must also think this mysterious person arranged to have the Packers D not sack Palmer and Randall not cover Fitzgerald in OT, right? And of course McCarthy and the players were fine with this because... .... No. That idea, in the
complete absence of a single fact to back it up is in no way plausible.
Alleging things with no evidence would be analogous to a neighbor of yours going to the police with the allegation that you are a thief and *********. Evidence; None. Plausible; Well you have a lot of stuff and you've been seen you around children. That’s what you’re doing here: There’s no evidence whatever
yet.