warhawk
Cheesehead
packerfan1245 said:We ARE NOT losing Green. WE dont need a RB we have AHMAN GREEN. HELLO PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Green is a unrestricted free agent. He's in his 30's. He's not going to be here much longer whether he's back next year. At most I read that GB wants him back for a 2 year deal but they are still going to pursue his eventual replacement. Green also is wearing down. His numbers have dropped every year. A younger back would be huge for Green as they can split time. Even the two Super Bowl teams have 2 quality backs on their teams. As did the Saints, and Patriots whom played them in the respective conferences. A young RB is one of the most pressing needs for the Packers right now whether Green is a fan favorite or not.
It is time to look to who the next guy will be. Other teams have brought that solid rookie in to split time with the vet and both players benefited greatly. Especially important for Green with his breathing concerns and stamina issues.
Having said that I do not think TT will shove a running back down the first rounds throat. In other words, he will take the best guy available, worthy of a mid first round pick first.
The popular choice is going to be RB or WR because why? We need them that's why. DO NOT DRAFT FOR NEED. Remember?
There will be a lot of football players on the board when we make that first pick. We limit that pick to a RB or a WR and we may just pass on a GREAT player far more worthy of that 16th pick.
That's why I don't like post draft "grades". They tend to grade teams on how well they "filled needs" and is also why down the road teams with lousy grades from a draft actually ended up with some great players.
This is also why some teams routinely blow their first pick(including us in the past). They NEED a position filled so badly they overlook the shortcomings of those on on the short list at that position. Big mistake.
Keep track of the BIG picture, stay up with the BIG board, end up with a BIG player. Forget what position the guy plays.