H
HardRightEdge
Guest
Only the effete corp of impudents snobs quote him these days.You don't see Spiro Agnew references every day.
Only the effete corp of impudents snobs quote him these days.You don't see Spiro Agnew references every day.
I don't think check downs to the RB are going to work well this game. #1, I don't think the Bears will have to commit that many people to rushing the QB that Jones or Williams will be left alone. after 3,4 seconds and then come back to the check down, i have a feeling they'll be cleaned up by one of their Linebackers before they even turn and run. If anything, they'll have to get the RB or WR moving before the snap and quick hit it to beat some of the speed of the linebackers and that defense. It's going to have to be snap..ball out. that's going to have to build the rest of the offense for the day.
I was thinking about this as well. I do prefer when the offense plays no huddle and if they see Mack leave the field to get a breather, that could be a time when they really want to play hurry up and keep him off the field.Ideally if the Pack win the coin toss I'd like to see them take the ball to start and go no huddle to try and score quick. Don't let them sub or anything to get set.
breeland is on his way back to GB.
ahh, that's tough. If he's headed back to GB, I assume he'll be on the field then. Sometimes these things can be a distraction, sometimes the field lets them escape and they hyperfocus and have the game of their life. Either way, even though we all lose people, I hope he's ok.Yup, sounds like he lost someone close in a car accident.
Bashaud BreelandVerified account @Bree2Land6
Lost of words filled wit a lots of emotion never thought I’ll be losing a brother a friend just a genuine person period so soon! I lost a big part of my life my childhood last-night in… https://www.instagram.com/p/BrS7LAEnbs1/?utm_source=ig_twitter_share&igshid=16vr07b5ssn9d …
That one goes back as least as far as when Kennedy was in office.You don't see Spiro Agnew references every day.
Nattering nabobs? I didn't know that.That one goes back as least as far as when Kennedy was in office.
Brett Favre had a "tough personal matter", the death of his father, and he played and played well.
I was thinking about this as well. I do prefer when the offense plays no huddle and if they see Mack leave the field to get a breather, that could be a time when they really want to play hurry up and keep him off the field.
If those three don't play, it could be a very long day.The Packers listed Bryan Bulaga as doubtful with Bashaud Breeland and Kenny Clark being questionable vs. the Bears.
I disagree. I think the Packers will be playing loose and play much better because of it. They have nothing to lose, so anything is on the table. The Bears should be worried.I'll avoid this one like the plague. It will be too painful to watch.
If those three don't play, it could be a very long day.
william saffire, September 11, 1970, for spiro agnew.That one goes back as least as far as when Kennedy was in office.
The Bears always had a fairly good defense.Would anyone have believed that before the season that it would be the Bears running away with the division with 3 games to play?
That is a highly questionable proposition, isn't it? If the Bears go that route, at least it's from the front side and not the back. I suppose Spriggs best chance in that matchup is to set against the inside move and push him out to the edge. At least Rodgers would see him with the possibility to step up and escape. Or just get more than the usual roll lefts installed.Bulaga will definitely not play tomorrow, having me extremely concerned about Spriggs lining up against Mack.