D
Deleted member 6794
Guest
You know, I've never seen Knighton moved out of position either.
The last time Raji played an entire season at NT in 2011 he was absolutely terrible (ranked 87th out of 88 DT/NT by PFF).
You know, I've never seen Knighton moved out of position either.
Unless Raji plays lights-out AND the Pack wins the SB this year, I figure it's a lose-lose. If he flops again, it's good money after bad. If he shines, he'll probably be too expensive to re-sign.
You know, I've never seen Knighton moved out of position either.
Unless Raji plays lights-out AND the Pack wins the SB this year, I figure it's a lose-lose. If he flops again, it's good money after bad. If he shines, he'll probably be too expensive to re-sign.
I really can't help but shake my head at the number of 'he was playing out of position' excuses made for Raji. It's not at all uncommon for big 3-4 DT's to spend most of their career playing both at the nose and outside. Wilfork and Ngata have done plenty of each. Guess what, they dominated at both. Matthews spent the last half of 2014 playing out of position. He still dominated. Good players are still good players, regardless of where they line up, and moving one spot over with your hand still in the dirt doesn't turn a really good player into a really bad one.
Unless we were talking about Raji moving to OLB and dropping back into coverage, the excuses for him playing out of position are wishful thinking at best. He could still have a good 2015, but it won't be because of him being back inside.
I don't understand all the Raji skeptics here. He was moved back to NT last year and although it was pre-season last year he was playing very well until he got hurt.
I think someone just started a rumor based on wishful thinking that he was having a great camp. We never got a chance to see if he was "back" or not. Though with more down years than up, can he really be "back" reminds me of a spoof on LL CoolJ. "Don't call it a comeback, I haven't worked in years."People have said this multiple times. His pre-season stats last year were a total of 1 tackle over 3 preseason games. What exactly was it that he was doing before his injury that was wowing people into thinking the old Raji was back?
People have said this multiple times. His pre-season stats last year were a total of 1 tackle over 3 preseason games. What exactly was it that he was doing before his injury that was wowing people into thinking the old Raji was back?
Probably only playing a couple series max and NT is not a big stats position.
Not defending Raji, just that I wouldn't put much into that stat.
After the injury, Tyler Dunne mentioned in an article that "Raji had been having a solid summer, re-acclimating himself to the nose" and provided this link: http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/271749281.htmlI think someone just started a rumor based on wishful thinking that he was having a great camp.
People have said this multiple times. His pre-season stats last year were a total of 1 tackle over 3 preseason games. What exactly was it that he was doing before his injury that was wowing people into thinking the old Raji was back?
He was getting consistent penetration into the back field if you go back and watch the tape. There is more to evaluating a NT level of play other then just tackles.
When he disrupts up front effectively it opens up the opportunity for others to make tackles for positive run defense plays.
You're right, he sucks… we're so screwed. Better?
I'd be interested to go back and look and see if that's what was happening. One of the big problems for him in 2013 was that he was no longer commanding double teams.
Not really, interjecting a snide and sarcastic comment into the conversation really provides no insight or analysis and offers no value to the conversation.
I really don't understand this board. It's ok to be completely negative sometimes and other times it's wrong. Some day someone will explain it to me.
Makes no sense. If Raji plays well he gives us a better chance to win a Superbowl this year whether we ultimately win or not, if he sucks we have no liability for him going into next year. If he's too expensive to re-sign we still get a compensatory pick and an extra year to see what we have in Thornton, Pennell etc... Putting a qualifier in like "unless we win the Superbowl" is stupid because that could be used to say every single signing ever wasn't worth it if the team didn't win. The odds are low that any particular team will win the Superbowl in a given year. All you can do is try and give yourself a better chance.
Oops, I thought he was only signed to a one year contract, in which case there is no compensatory pick.