GreenBaySlacker
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
- Messages
- 3,103
- Reaction score
- 213
I don't understand how this trend of the most recent qb contract being "the biggest contract in NFL history"....every time?
I mean flacco was highest paid? Stafford was highest paid? cousins will be?...I mean these guys are good but not the best... #12 is the best.....
So how does cousins contract even relate to what #12 is worth. It's goofy.....if cousins gets 28. Then proportionately Rodgers should be worth 40... imo. Or if Rodgers justifiably becomes the highest paid player in the league, at say $30... then cousins should be worth 20-22 possibly. Right?
So why when say Mathew Stafford's deal comes up a couple years ago. Why are the lions seemingly obligated to make him the highest paid qb in the league? When he hasn't won....anything. ?
I mean flacco was highest paid? Stafford was highest paid? cousins will be?...I mean these guys are good but not the best... #12 is the best.....
So how does cousins contract even relate to what #12 is worth. It's goofy.....if cousins gets 28. Then proportionately Rodgers should be worth 40... imo. Or if Rodgers justifiably becomes the highest paid player in the league, at say $30... then cousins should be worth 20-22 possibly. Right?
So why when say Mathew Stafford's deal comes up a couple years ago. Why are the lions seemingly obligated to make him the highest paid qb in the league? When he hasn't won....anything. ?