Assorted Debates

[tromadz]

-2 for tombrady hater

calm down, let people actually discuss it!

 

[thetombradyhater]

I'm waiting...

 

[Zero2Cool]

So, I guess I would be Steven A. Smith eh?

 

[thetombradyhater]

I'm Woody, w00t.

 

[Philtration]

Re: Popcorns Top 15 RBs and QBs

Let Rodgers take over, it will be better for all.

ITYM, it would be better for the Queens. It's funny how it seems consistant that fans of the Queens, Lions and Bears all seem to think Brett should retire because "he is hurting the team". I remember when Joey Heatherton was QB of the Lions, I hoped he would retire there... at 45. That would almost guarantee 2 division wins a year for the Pack. :lol:

As far as Vick being a top 10 QB... Wasn't Atlanta one of the 4 teams GB beat last season? That says a lot right there.

GO PACK!!!

Robert C. Hedley

I never said that Favre should retire. I said that he should make up his mind and then shut up about it. That is pretty much how fans all over the country feel about him to tell you the truth.

I'm sure Brett cares

And I am sure that he really cares about you guys crying "4 more years" before he high tailed it out of Wisconsin again.

 

[Anubis]

Bengals

I agree, providing Palmer comes back 100%.

GO PACK!!!

Robert C. Hedley

 

[Philtration]

Mariotti went into a resteraunt my buddy works at downtown...and he was blocking traffic...was a ****, and did the "dont you know who I am" routine when the hostess asked his name...hes such a joke...

I hope ozzie guillen beats him up and calls him more names,

o yeah your from Chicago

No, we voted him out. It came down to Trom or that obnoxious weirdo Ronnie "Woo Woo" Wickers and Trom had to go.
The saddest part was when they put his stuff out in the street. I have never seen so many nude photos of Gilbert Gottfried in my life.

 

[arrowgargantuan]

The saddest part was when they put his stuff out in the street. I have never seen so many nude photos of Gilbert Gottfried in my life.

lol..good stuff.

 

[tromadz]

actually ronnie woo woo is dead

you son of a *****! dont mock the dead

 

[Philtration]

actually ronnie woo woo is dead

you son of a *****! dont mock the dead

Pretty much anything associated with the Cubs is dead at this point Trom.
Like their chances of them going to the World Series in your lifetime.

 

[tromadz]

yawn...you're boring me.

-9 for phil for mocking the dead and being a *********

 

[Philtration]

yawn...you're boring me.

-9 for phil for mocking the dead and being a *********

Being a fan of both the Cubs and the Packers, you should be pretty used to being bored by now.

I can just see you now.... sitting there listening to your brand new "Fine Young Cannibals" CD with your pants down around your ankles.

 

[tromadz]

I only got bored when the bears would come on...jim miller...kordell stewart...now mr. glass.

 

[Ryan]

:looks around:

where did the topic go?

 

[tromadz]

-2 for ryan

 

[pyledriver80]

Hehe, I'm sorry I missed this. I would just like to go back to Popcorns Rivers vs. Rodgers thing.


You see Popcorn, this is the problem with Vikings fans. If you knew Rivers was in a better situation why did you have to go to NFL.com to try to find some bogus stats to prove your point? I mean if you didn't know Rodgers played and threw a few passes whats that say about your credibility? How can you expect people to take anything you say serious when originally it was Rivers has more Experience than Rodgers, until you got called on it, than it changed. It's pure Packer hatred and totally biased.


It obvious to me that you were just stating garbage to try to degrade Rodgers and the Packers. You made a bogus point to try to coverup for your other bogus point{Favre should retire}

It seems you make a habit of making bogus,biased posts. On top of that you were not man enough to own up to it. Instead you resorted to mad scrambling to cover it up. It's has nothing to do with NFL.com being wrong but everything to do with you making a statement based on hatred for the Packers. If you knew what you were talking about, you would never had to go to NFL.com to check to see if it fit your argument to begin with.

 

[tromadz]

+2 for Pyle

 

[pyledriver80]

+2 for Pyle

Kisses Trom, and confesses his secret love for him. Then kicks him in the teeth.

 

[tromadz]

-3 for pyle

 

[all about da packers]

+2 for Pyle

Kisses Trom, and confesses his secret love for him.

Is it a full moon tonight? :-?

 

[pyledriver80]

-3 for pyle

Dammit back to -1. Why does Trom get to be the scorekeeper, I'm screwed.

 

[Popcorn]

Hehe, I'm sorry I missed this. I would just like to go back to Popcorns Rivers vs. Rodgers thing.


You see Popcorn, this is the problem with Vikings fans. If you knew Rivers was in a better situation why did you have to go to NFL.com to try to find some bogus stats to prove your point? I mean if you didn't know Rodgers played and threw a few passes whats that say about your credibility? How can you expect people to take anything you say serious when originally it was Rivers has more Experience than Rodgers, until you got called on it, than it changed. It's pure Packer hatred and totally biased.


It obvious to me that you were just stating garbage to try to degrade Rodgers and the Packers. You made a bogus point to try to coverup for your other bogus point{Favre should retire}

It seems you make a habit of making bogus,biased posts. On top of that you were not man enough to own up to it. Instead you resorted to mad scrambling to cover it up. It's has nothing to do with NFL.com being wrong but everything to do with you making a statement based on hatred for the Packers. If you knew what you were talking about, you would never had to go to NFL.com to check to see if it fit your argument to begin with.

:roll: Im sorry for trying to check my facts and yes, I did check Rivers stats.

 

[thetombradyhater]

Hehe, I'm sorry I missed this. I would just like to go back to Popcorns Rivers vs. Rodgers thing.


You see Popcorn, this is the problem with Vikings fans. If you knew Rivers was in a better situation why did you have to go to NFL.com to try to find some bogus stats to prove your point? I mean if you didn't know Rodgers played and threw a few passes whats that say about your credibility? How can you expect people to take anything you say serious when originally it was Rivers has more Experience than Rodgers, until you got called on it, than it changed. It's pure Packer hatred and totally biased.


It obvious to me that you were just stating garbage to try to degrade Rodgers and the Packers. You made a bogus point to try to coverup for your other bogus point{Favre should retire}

It seems you make a habit of making bogus,biased posts. On top of that you were not man enough to own up to it. Instead you resorted to mad scrambling to cover it up. It's has nothing to do with NFL.com being wrong but everything to do with you making a statement based on hatred for the Packers. If you knew what you were talking about, you would never had to go to NFL.com to check to see if it fit your argument to begin with.

:roll: Im sorry for trying to check my facts and yes, I did check Rivers stats.

the current topic is NFC North not Rivers versus A-rod... Reali I smell a deduction

 

[Zero2Cool]

The Rivers/Rodgers thing has been explained to Popcorn thoroughly. He now understands his theory as why Rivers is being better groomed than Rodgers was inaccurate and in fact Rodgers is being better groomed than Rivers. Let's let him start a new debate, hopefully one more challenging.


heh heh

 

[Popcorn]

The Rivers/Rodgers thing has been explained to Popcorn thoroughly. He now understands his theory as why Rivers is being better groomed than Rodgers was inaccurate and in fact Rodgers is being better groomed than Rivers. Let's let him start a new debate, hopefully one more challenging.


heh heh

Just a quick note: I have yet to have my opinion changed in these/this debate.

On to something else:

Ummmm...



I cant think of anything. Someone else bring something up.