thequick12
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2014
- Messages
- 3,249
- Reaction score
- 631
Looks like the Packers may be set to extend devondre campbell before his contract voids at midnight...
Looks like the Packers may be set to extend devondre campbell before his contract voids at midnight...
Campbell's contract already voided last week.
I push back this opens a four year window. There is a TON of money coming due, and that is without a bloated Adams contract, a year three or so Jaire contract, a massively bloated Bakh contract in a couple years and kiss Elgton Jenkins resigning goodbye cuz we will not be able to pay our most valuable across the board lineman with all these moves.Redirect Notice
www.google.com
"Going with the more aggressive transactions for Rodgers and Alexander, keeping Preston Smith but not Za’Darius Smith, releasing Cobb, extending Amos and Turner, and leaving Lowry and Crosby untouched, the Packers could create about $65.75 million in cap savings. That would give the Packers about $15.75 million of cap space even after franchising Adams – plenty of money to re-sign All-Pro linebacker De’Vondre Campbell. The Packers could then save even more cap space by extending Adams, money that could be used for a midseason extension for Elgton Jenkins, who is entering his final season under contract."
This is the last paragraph of the linked article by Bill Huber...and what ive been saying and still think is gonna happen. Im not for every single move described but most... This opens another 4 year window in which the Rodgers led Packers should be legitimate SB contenders every season
I push back this opens a four year window. There is a TON of money coming due, and that is without a bloated Adams contract, a year three or so Jaire contract, a massively bloated Bakh contract in a couple years and kiss Elgton Jenkins resigning goodbye cuz we will not be able to pay our most valuable across the board lineman with all these moves.
I see it realistically you can do a one year window push, maybe two - but I don't see realistically even with voided years and contract gymnastics you make it three or more.
Well Adams long term deal will surely lower his 2022 cap number assuming the packers do end up tagging him...
Jenkins will be resigned either like this article theorized in season or during the off season. No way they letting him walk
I believe youre still underestimating how much the cap is gonna go up over next 5 years
They are making it more than 2 thats for sure...because of the extension they gonna sign Rodgers to
Plus remaining healthy. We need to get some injury luck on our side and be in the top 10 least injured metric. Last season we stayed bottom 10The only way you keep this/an elite team together with what we are doing is you have to HIT in a big way on draft picks or get extremely lucky again like we did with pick ups after compensatory times like Rasul and Campbell - which were literally like lightning striking. It is possible, sure, but by all the pushing and bloating of contracts we are doing the margin of error is becoming thinner than the edge of a blade.
I push back this opens a four year window. There is a TON of money coming due, and that is without a bloated Adams contract, a year three or so Jaire contract, a massively bloated Bakh contract in a couple years and kiss Elgton Jenkins resigning goodbye cuz we will not be able to pay our most valuable across the board lineman with all these moves.
I agree that the moves the Packers have already made and will still make moving forward won't result in a four year championship window. They will be able to re-sign Jenkins though.
You continue throwing out massive salary cap "estimated" increases with not much information to back it up. Only 3 times in the last 25 years has the cap increased double-digit%. Didn't investigate if tied to a new TV deal: 1998- 26.4% increase, 2006- 19.3%, and 2022-14.1%. All other years have been a modest 5-8.5% increase. It's foolhardy, in my opinion, to keep pushing money further out. Yes, there's more competition for new broadcasters to land part of the TV deal, but I highly doubt that translates to yearly double-digit cap increases. Hoping Gute exercises some fiscal responsibility this & next year & keeps GB relevant post-Rodgers.If the cap goes up by the estimated 15% that has been rumored...that would put it at over 239 million for 2023, over 275 m in 2024, and over 316 m in 2023
This can be worked while avoiding "cap hell" yes gute needs to hit on some picks but thats how its always been as a draft develop and keep your own team
Isn't Aaron Jones' contract set up for him to be gone after this year?I guess looking at window it could be swung, primarily due to quite a few contracts that will be "shed" after this season when Jenkins contract comes up....I say "shed" because voided money will increase that hit all at once on many which are gone.
2022 Cap Hit Guys that will be gone after this year:
Adrian Amos - $11.9M
Preston Smith - $19,720,588 (expect this to change before season in some capacity)
Randall Cobb - $9,531,372 (same as above)
Billy Turner - $9,169,412
Rashan Gary - $5,051,872 (However I expect 5th year option picked up so he will be back and more expensive)
Mason Crosby - $4,735,000
Darnell Savage - $3,982,901
Aaron Rodgers - $46M....of course we all know this is going to change
Jaire - $13M
Marcedes - $2.445M
Dean Lowry - $8.07M
That is a lot of guys....really that list will be slightly shorter as most likely one or more of these will be cut or restructured/extended to be here beyond this coming season.
Ding ding ding. Winner winner chicken dinner.Folks also keep forgetting the increase will be across the board, it won't magically make the Packers in a better position relative to the league....fiscally that is.
Agreed and if someone wants to get a good idea of the history of the cap, I have included a link below. People shouldn't be using 2021 to 2022 numbers as the new norm. That was Covid induced.You continue throwing out massive salary cap "estimated" increases with not much information to back it up. Only 3 times in the last 25 years has the cap increased double-digit%. Didn't investigate if tied to a new TV deal: 1998- 26.4% increase, 2006- 19.3%, and 2022-14.1%. All other years have been a modest 5-8.5% increase. It's foolhardy, in my opinion, to keep pushing money further out. Yes, there's more competition for new broadcasters to land part of the TV deal, but I highly doubt that translates to yearly double-digit cap increases. Hoping Gute exercises some fiscal responsibility this & next year & keeps GB relevant post-Rodgers.
As far as being able to compete for free agents money wise you are right. Every team will have more money to spend so the competition remains the same.Folks also keep forgetting the increase will be across the board, it won't magically make the Packers in a better position relative to the league....fiscally that is.
Without a crystal ball, sure. SportracIsn't Aaron Jones' contract set up for him to be gone after this year?
Amen.Folks also keep forgetting the increase will be across the board, it won't magically make the Packers in a better position relative to the league....fiscally that is.
You continue throwing out massive salary cap "estimated" increases with not much information to back it up. Only 3 times in the last 25 years has the cap increased double-digit%. Didn't investigate if tied to a new TV deal: 1998- 26.4% increase, 2006- 19.3%, and 2022-14.1%. All other years have been a modest 5-8.5% increase. It's foolhardy, in my opinion, to keep pushing money further out. Yes, there's more competition for new broadcasters to land part of the TV deal, but I highly doubt that translates to yearly double-digit cap increases. Hoping Gute exercises some fiscal responsibility this & next year & keeps GB relevant post-Rodgers.
I don't understand where your center paragraph is going? All rosters are built using some very highly paid "stars" (3rd or more contract) some moderately priced 2nd contract vets as the "core", and the remainder are low-end rookies who get 3-4 years to develop (for 2nd contract) or are cast away.Amen.
Add to that does anyone really believe that average expected future salaries will stay stagnant over that same time?
Do the math across an entire roster by multiplying our current cap ceiling with an increasing factor by just a conservative 7.5% annual compensation increase compounded yearly. What does that equate to in cap dollars over 3-4 seasons?
The league funded increase is designed to support cost of living +-..
It’s not designed to fund extra aggressive overexpenditures
Yeah unless he would re-do his contract in a massive way there is a negative percent chance he is here in 2023 as his contract is.Isn't Aaron Jones' contract set up for him to be gone after this year?
Well i guess we shall see who was right...im betting its me
What % did the roster as a whole get as an increase going back several seasons?I don't understand where your center paragraph is going? All rosters are built using some very highly paid "stars" (3rd or more contract) some moderately priced 2nd contract vets as the "core", and the remainder are low-end rookies who get 3-4 years to develop (for 2nd contract) or are cast away.
The stars usually get massive percentage increases, the 2nd contract guys get healthy raises (50-300%). I don't believe you can use the straight 7.5% across the board increase because every a team creates and loses a few stars, mid-level 2nd contract players, and fills rosters with low-end rookies/FA's.
Ok im down for that for sure...thats a good ideaIn order to properly judge that each of you would need to actually predict a number. Maybe we can make a "guess the 2023 cap number" poll thread.