2024 Weekly Report Card: Matt LaFleur

DoURant

Go Pack Go!
Joined
Mar 25, 2017
Messages
1,005
Reaction score
494
Location
Michigan
I'm externally disappointed in the results of this game. This was far from a well played game, which they needed desperately to have a chance to win. I give MLF a "D". I thought about giving him an "F", but the players deserve some responsibility too. 6 drops, 3 botched snaps in shot gun, Love's INT... you can't say those are Matt's fault. Coaches need to coach, and players need to perform, and after watching today's game, there is a lot of blame to go around for this loss.
 

Magooch

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 15, 2021
Messages
960
Reaction score
911
I’ll repeat what I mentioned in the game thread: when it comes to your team’s behavior, preparation, discipline, etc… your head coach is either coaching/encouraging that behavior or they’re permitting/tolerating it.
 

milani

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
4,839
Reaction score
1,874
I'm externally disappointed in the results of this game. This was far from a well played game, which they needed desperately to have a chance to win. I give MLF a "D". I thought about giving him an "F", but the players deserve some responsibility too. 6 drops, 3 botched snaps in shot gun, Love's INT... you can't say those are Matt's fault. Coaches need to coach, and players need to perform, and after watching today's game, there is a lot of blame to go around for this loss.
And mental preparation in bad weather conditions are paramount. When Lombardi won the 1962 championship it was barely 20 degrees with 25-40 mph winds. They won the game in the trenches with turnovers and FGs. No big fancy highlights.
 

GBkrzygrl

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
816
Reaction score
270
Well, let’s see.

Outplayed on offense
Outplayed on defense
Outplayed on special teams
Less disciplined and less prepared than the opponent
A ten point loss that felt like it could’ve/should’ve been thirty

If a few weeks ago vs Arizona was some of the best from LaFleur, today was some of the worst.

I guess I could call it a “D” if I’m being generous but from a coaching perspective I imagine that’s as close to an “F” as we’ll see. The comparison to Campbell’s team - specifically when it comes to preparation, discipline, and execution - couldn’t be more jarring.
I saw one creative play. When La Fleur had Kraft run for the 1st down. Where was all the creativity he used when planning with Willis?
 
OP
OP
XPack

XPack

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,700
Reaction score
566
Location
Garden State
Bye Week Summary:

Loss - Week 1 vs Eagles: C
Win - Week 2 vs Colts: A
Win - Week 3 vs Titans: B
Loss - Week 4 vs Vikings: C
Win - Week 5 vs Rams: B
Win - Week 6 vs Cardinals: A
Win - Week 7 vs Texans: B
Week 8 vs Jaguars: B
Week 9 vs Lions: D

* Winning record, Losing record, Tied

I've went through everyone's comments and tried to average and round out the scores and end up with 2xA, 4xB, 2xC, 1xD. It's a decent enough performance but have to note that for Texans and Jaguars, we were 1 FG away from those Bs turning into Cs.

It's well below MLFs capabilities. Overall across 9 games, I'll give MLF a C (would ideally be a B- or something, but the Lions loss irks me greatly) till Bye Week.

Top things to improve:
1. Stop Love's gunslinging (and resulting INTs). Rein him back and make intelligent plays. He's not AR, so go back to strategy of second half of last season!
2. Stop stupid penalties. It's just training and discipline.
3. Get some FA support for Linebackers and Corner.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
15,730
Reaction score
6,692
Conceivably we should get some support for our Chicago contest.
My best guess is J’aire and Evan will be back for that to bolster the D. Im merely just guessing, but we should conceivably begin to see sightings of Musgrave and Marshawn over the next couple of weeks following our Bye to inject the Offense with more talent.

Even so, I still think CB is a priority if an option presents itself to upgrade. Almost getting to the juncture we need 3 Perimeter CB’s to cover 2 spots due to injury.
As you submitted, an inside LB (that has some Pass Rush prowess) could be another Avenue.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
15,730
Reaction score
6,692
The One good thing we can always lean back on is this is 1 week. The sun will come up tomorrow, but we’d better work on those infractions until they are automatic. We needed a wake up call and we got exactly that.
Position coaches need to review that film thoroughly and revisit scenarios in practice to address each flag. It’s way too late in a season to commit 10 flags in 3 Quarters.
 
Last edited:

milani

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
4,839
Reaction score
1,874
Conceivably we should get some support for our Chicago contest.
My best guess is J’aire and Evan will be back for that to bolster the D. Im merely just guessing, but we should conceivably begin to see sightings of Musgrave and Marshawn over the next couple of weeks following our Bye to inject the Offense with more talent.

Even so, I still think CB is a priority if an option presents itself to upgrade. Almost getting to the juncture we need 3 Perimeter CB’s to cover 2 spots due to injury.
As you submitted, an inside LB (that has some Pass Rush prowess) could be another Avenue.
We need more than 1 TE to perform. That is a strength of both the Lions and Vikings.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top