And we know how Midwest weather can change in the next 5 days.Current forecast for Saturday is high of 22, which means upper teens at game time. Not quite the balmy 50's SF is used to, but not a huge advantage for GB. Hope the GB faithful are LOUD whenever Garoppolo comes to the line, however.
I used to always think that, but I tell you what, modern technology seems to have really made weather forecasting pretty darn accurate, within a 7 day or so window. Sure it may be up or down a few degrees and the snow might be an inch or two more or less, but for the most part, you can set your watch to the forecasts.And we know how Midwest weather can change in the next 5 days.
As a whole I'm not sure it'll be a huge factor, but I think it's quite likely that Garoppolo will struggle. I'm not sure how many games he's ever played in sub freezing temperatures. The one game this year he played where it was even below 40 was in Seattle and he sucked.I don't expect the 9er's to be impacted by the weather in the least. I do expect us to have a slight advantage because we are at home.
Peyton Manning struggled in cold games. I think up until his final Super Bowl Season, he hadn't won any playoff games when the temps were below 40. His regular season record wasn't that good either in "cold" games.As a whole I'm not sure it'll be a huge factor, but I think it's quite likely that Garoppolo will struggle. I'm not sure how many games he's ever played in sub freezing temperatures. The one game this year he played where it was even below 40 was in Seattle and he sucked.
Not to mention his thumb issue. Things like that accentuate in really cold temps.
49ers team doc: how many fingers am i holding up?Right. I'm sure concussion protocol goes out the window in San Francisco, this week.
Probably the same juice Tom Brady is using. Fresh from Brazil.He’ll be juiced up and ready to go, don’t worry
We held them to 67 yards rushing in September, and still needed a last second FG to win it.
They had a decimated backfield after the Philly game. That helped a little.That's going to be interesting. The first meeting was during the time the 49ers were playing like crap and were not playing good football (hence their 3-5 record after 9 weeks). Since then though, the 49ers have turned it around and are on a roll. Other than QB, both sides are playing really well.
But it's at Lambeau, so it will give GB the advantage.
I don't think playing at Green Bay is a disadvantage for the Niners. They are a tough, physical team with a good running game. Just the type of team that will benefit from bad weather. The Packers are a finesse team that needs a dominant passing game. Just the type of team that would benefit from a mild day.That's going to be interesting. The first meeting was during the time the 49ers were playing like crap and were not playing good football (hence their 3-5 record after 9 weeks). Since then though, the 49ers have turned it around and are on a roll. Other than QB, both sides are playing really well.
But it's at Lambeau, so it will give GB the advantage.
Anyone can win anywhere if properly prepared and motivatedI don't think playing at Green Bay is a disadvantage for the Niners. They are a tough, physical team with a good running game. Just the type of team that will benefit from bad weather. The Packers are a finesse team that needs a dominant passing game. Just the type of team that would benefit from a mild day.
Who said anything about "bad weather"? It's going to be great weather, nice and cold with a bit of a breeze. Rodgers played absolutely fine in it against the Vikings a few weeks ago. Matter of fact, the Vikings didn't run the ball that great and they were considered a decent running team, even the same average yards per carry as the 9'ers at 4.3Just the type of team that will benefit from bad weather.
You just reminded me. We need to do what was successful against the Vikes. Get out into a lead and force them to play against their relative strengths. Force SF to Throw the ball and risk Turnovers.Who said anything about "bad weather"? It's going to be great weather, nice and cold with a bit of a breeze. Rodgers played absolutely fine in it against the Vikings a few weeks ago. Matter of fact, the Vikings didn't run the ball that great and they were considered a decent running team, even the same average yards per carry as the 9'ers at 4.3
Of course Jimmy G is/should be a better QB than Sean Mannion, but with a bad finger, shoulder and wrist, who knows what we will see out of him in 10 degree and colder weather. If he lets it get into his head that those injuries are effecting his passes, maybe the healthy Mannion that the Packers faced in early Jan. is a better QB.You just reminded me. We need to do what was successful against the Vikes. Get out into a lead and force them to play against their relative strengths. Force SF to Throw the ball and risk Turnovers.
I feel good about getting at least 1 INT if Garrapolo tosses it 30+ times
I don't think playing at Green Bay is a disadvantage for the Niners. They are a tough, physical team with a good running game. Just the type of team that will benefit from bad weather. The Packers are a finesse team that needs a dominant passing game. Just the type of team that would benefit from a mild day.
Yup....the Packers are 7-6 at home during the playoffs in the last 20 years. So yes, your 49'ers have a chance.Yeah, I think it's going to be a good game. Both teams are playing really well and there's a reason why they are playing. I heard Packers have like 6 home playoff losses in the last 20 years (or something like that), which was the most in that span. That was a surprising stat to see. So anything is possible.
I don't like hearing that, although note that it is a winning record. Not exactly the dominant home playoff record we once had at Lambeau. Especially when they still put out the hype that Lambeau holds the biggest home field playoff advantage in the NFL.Yup....the Packers are 7-6 at home during the playoffs in the last 20 years.
Well....maybe if all those games were on the road, we lose them by bigger margins or win them by smaller margins.I don't like hearing that, although note that it is a winning record. Not exactly the dominant home playoff record we once had at Lambeau. Especially when they still put out the hype that Lambeau holds the biggest home field playoff advantage in the NFL.
I have not really heard that in a while. I have heard more of how tough it is to play in KC.I don't like hearing that, although note that it is a winning record. Not exactly the dominant home playoff record we once had at Lambeau. Especially when they still put out the hype that Lambeau holds the biggest home field playoff advantage in the NFL.
I still prefer the 80,000 loud throng yelling for our side than the one on a mild day in SF.I don't think playing at Green Bay is a disadvantage for the Niners. They are a tough, physical team with a good running game. Just the type of team that will benefit from bad weather. The Packers are a finesse team that needs a dominant passing game. Just the type of team that would benefit from a mild day.
Interesting.Yup....the Packers are 7-6 at home during the playoffs in the last 20 years. So yes, your 49'ers have a chance.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
They're 10-8, including this year. And 6 of those have been since 2018, when Mahomes took over. Since he stepped in, they're 6-1 at home in the postseason, losing only to Brady and the Patriots.I have not really heard that in a while. I have heard more of how tough it is to play in KC.