gopkrs
Cheesehead
- Joined
- May 12, 2014
- Messages
- 5,885
- Reaction score
- 1,561
Well, yes, more like a two three punch.
Not if Vitale carves out 33+% of the offensive snaps. Sounds like OC Hackett loves the versatility and "options" that having Vitale in the lineup gives him. IF they run 2 back (or 2 TE) offense more than we think they might the 3rd WR won't be on the field as often.The Packers will line up with three wide receivers on the majority of snaps on offense.
i'm sure that's true but if the offense is to be less predictable rodgers has to get past his dependency on adams. D's are going to be keying on him and he's probably going to be doubled a lot anyway. it's only smart to go elsewhere. from what i'm hearing allison is working from the 3 more than anyone else...which seems odd to me but this new O is new to everyone.There's no doubt in my mind that Adams will receive the majority of targets and be the most productive receiver on the team by a wide margin. The Packers will need Allison and at least another WR to put up decent numbers to have success on offense though. It seems MVS is the front runner to be the #3 at this point.
It depends on how the OP question is interpreted. It seems most of the posts so far interpret it as, "who do you like to breakout this season"? On that basis, MVS is the guy that comes first to my mind.
Broadly speaking, having Rodgers at QB is always the chief cause for excitement. Otherwise, what's the point given the alternatives?
I got a David Bakhtari Jersey last year and my husband (a Pats fan) got a Shaq Mason Jersey. Matching #69’s and Bakh is the best player on our team.haven't been keeping up with this year's talents. So i'm just curious how Clay Matthews will do. Never thought I'd see him in another jersey. Well, that could be said about Nelson too. You see, the problem comes down to this...I bought his jersey that was "on sale" for $100...something long time ago. Now I would look pretty stupid going to a game wearing his jersey. Come to think of it I don't even want to purchase a jersey of the guys we have now. Now sure who is good or who will stay. Do we have any player who is #62 and have the same last name "Matthews?" I could change the number 5 to 6.
Jake Kumerow, probably. There's been enough hype on him past two seasons and hope he doesn't turn into another .... you know who.
King... He should be our #1. And will be if he plays up to his potential. Imo
First. I want nothing more than Jenkins to succeed and we’re in agreement there. Aaron Rodgers, however, could easily play into his 40’s. We absolutely, positively can’t back off of continually rebuilding the O -Line year to year. We said the same thing a few years ago and then got decimated because we were unprepared to have adequate depth at OL and failed to keep the OLine resources throttle down. There’s too many ways to lose OL players through the years ((through the games for that matter).If he does, and if we can draft a good right tackle next year, we would appear to have a very strong OL with very solid depth for the remainder of Arods years.
First. I want nothing more than Jenkins to succeed and we’re in agreement there. Aaron Rodgers, however, could easily play into his 40’s. We absolutely, positively can’t back off of continually rebuilding the O -Line year to year. .
Absolutely you can (and we have) found some in those middle rounds. But also throw an occasional top 1-2 draft day selection or grab a starter capable one in FA or both. The default need to protect the QB pocket/support the Run (which takes pressure off the QB also) is curving into the more relevant year to year as a QB ages. Aaron deserves that and has earned that protection. In particular after these last few seasons. We should error on “too many resources” at OL if there is ever a question in doubt.Which is why I also said to draft a quality Right tackle next year. Don't disagree at all with you. I'd love to see at least a mid round pick used on an OL every year. You can find good ones in the 3-5 rounds.
It’s hard to say he undervalued guards when Sitton and Lang were some of the best guards in football for many of those yearsPretty much what Gute did his first year, drafted Jenkins in 2nd round and added Taylor in FA. He seems to understand the game is still won with the big boys up front. TT way undervalued guards in particular.
Do you wear those together in public?[/QUOTE]Matching #69’s....
[/QUOTE]Do you wear those together in public?
alexander's the #1 and it isn't close in my mind. king's the 2 by default but brown and holman are right on his tail. holman may be the best press guy we have btw from what i'm reading. we may have lucked into a great cb with holman.King... He should be our #1. And will be if he plays up to his potential. Imo
King... He should be our #1. And will be if he plays up to his potential. Imo
I think Jaire will be a pro bowl player for several years, he's so talented and will be our #1, but I agree that King has a lot of ability and would be a very strong #2. I like him a lot, he just needs a healthy 2020. I wasn't sold on Josh Jackson when we drafted him, even though I'm an Iowa fan, and I still have a lot of doubts. Hopefully, he can become at least solid at some point this season. Being out all of camp so far really hurts, he needs a lot of work on technique.
Not if Vitale carves out 33+% of the offensive snaps. Sounds like OC Hackett loves the versatility and "options" that having Vitale in the lineup gives him.
i'm sure that's true but if the offense is to be less predictable rodgers has to get past his dependency on adams. D's are going to be keying on him and he's probably going to be doubled a lot anyway. it's only smart to go elsewhere. from what i'm hearing allison is working from the 3 more than anyone else...which seems odd to me but this new O is new to everyone.
Aaron Rodgers (and Kizer) is getting mauled back there and this is the only year we’ve supplied him with adequate resources going back a decade.
You may be right, you may be wrong? 2018 offensive snaps broke down as: Jamaal Williams - 48.6% ; Aaron Jones - 35.01%; Ty Montgomery - 13.97%; Danny Vitale - 1.77%; and Kapri Bibbs - 1.58%. There were 17.32% of the offensive snaps that didn't go to Williams or Jones.I highly doubt Vitale plays anywhere close to 33% of the snaps this season.
You may be right, you may be wrong? 2018 offensive snaps broke down as: Jamaal Williams - 48.6% ; Aaron Jones - 35.01%; Ty Montgomery - 13.97%; Danny Vitale - 1.77%; and Kapri Bibbs - 1.58%. There were 17.32% of the offensive snaps that didn't go to Williams or Jones.
This is a different offense than MM's so I'll stand by my desired 33+% going to the "Ultra Back" Vitale who may be paired with Jones/Williams, replace them on 3rd downs and/or get work as the H-Back/motion TE to create mismatches.