Sky King
158.3
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2012
- Messages
- 2,817
- Reaction score
- 331
I should have made my point a little more clearly. Let me try again just for you:I wouldn't have felt comfortable with entering the season with Taysom Hill as the team's backup quarterback. Once again, it seems a lot of fans have already forgotten about what happened in 2013.
Only if Hundley had a stellar preseason this past Summer would he have become tradeable as early as this year, and it would have had to have brought a significant return on their original investment to make them take the risk of either Hill, Callahan or even some retread being their backup for 2017. That did not happen, obviously.
The next best scenario IMO would have been that Hundley remain as backup throughout this current regular season and that he try again next Summer to deliver a series of standout performances that could land him the starting job that he must surely crave. In the meantime, Hill could have been developed as the #3 either on the 53 or the PS. Hill was noticeably a better backup prospect for the future than Callahan this past preseason due to his exceptional athleticism.
The developments of yesterday make the latter point moot, of course. I wouldn't say we're "stuck" with Hundley as the backup. He have to do if he's all the team has left at QB. But his performances this past preseason were neither marginally starter-quality nor waiver wire poor. The biggest holes in his game are his affinity for getting sacked and his inability to throw successfully while on the run. Flush him from the pocket and he's not much of a dual threat to pass or run. Only to run. He makes some questionable judgments when not to throw the ball, as well. He's got plenty of room to grow. I hope we don't get to find out what he's capable of doing as a starter at any time during the 2017 season.