Dantés
Gute Loot
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2017
- Messages
- 12,116
- Reaction score
- 3,036
With Sanu off the table, perhaps the Packers should look towards another weapon from Atlanta: Austin Hooper.
Sanu and Sanders are both off the table now. Sanders is now in SF.
Sanu would have looked good in green and gold, but we need to keep second rounders in our pocket. Sanders ... Ehh I'm split on him. A veteran presence with good hands would have been nice. But speed wise, he doesn't look any better than what we had with Cobb last year, and at 32 I'd say he's past his prime.
I'm not really sure who would have an ILB that has playmaking capability but doesn't require a high draft pick to get. If we found one for a third or fourth plus Darrius Shepherd somewhere, id take it, but likely no proven commodity for that price.
About a month ago, I'd have been yelling at Gute and our scouts to jump on the WR trade train. Today, Im thinking we may not need to, or at least imo someone like Sanders wouldn't really give us much more than what we currently have, except maybe more catches than GMo. I've been tough on him for his drops and wish sometimes he'd be more consistent. But let's not forget there were fans just a few years ago who railed on Davante too for dropping balls and wanted him traded or cut. Needless to say ... Thank god we didn't.
I don't think Atlanta would be interested in trading him though. I have little doubt they're headed for a major overhaul with coaching changes etc, but Sanu had some value and is on the downside of his career. A good guy to unload for them because by the team hits their stride again (in theory) he'll not be a part of it anyway.With Sanu off the table, perhaps the Packers should look towards another weapon from Atlanta: Austin Hooper.
I don't think Atlanta would be interested in trading him though. I have little doubt they're headed for a major overhaul with coaching changes etc, but Sanu had some value and is on the downside of his career. A good guy to unload for them because by the team hits their stride again (in theory) he'll not be a part of it anyway.
Hooper is just going to be getting his 2nd contract. He's young and a guy they can still build around and will be a part of their success going forward in the coming years. I don't think they'd be interested in letting him go.
Burrow? The LSU QB? We would have to draft him, but he could be long gone before the Packers pick.Btw...I think we should sign Burrow. Just saying!
Minor correction, anybody put on IR after they were initially on the 53 man roster. EQ is on IR, but isn't eligible to come off it this year.Not anymore. Anybody put on IR can be activated (up to 2) after the timeframe has passed.
What would you have to give up for a guy with 2 more years on a dirt cheap 2nd. rounder contract if he's actually a player? A lot. But is he a player?Another interesting player who might not be available is the Dolphins' Raekwon McMillan. He's young and ascending. Seems like a guy you keep even if you're rebuilding. But who knows?
With Sanu off the board, the only guy out there that really intrigues me is Albert Wilson. If the Dolphins would give him up for a later pick, I would take the flier.
The tight ends, Hooper and Howard, really intrigue me. They will require more compensation, however. If they're made available at all, that is.
Good analysis. Even when Adams was healthy, it seemed they needed another WR, ideally a slot guy as a #2 veteran to replace Cobb.I still favor a pass catcher.
The passing game still lacks a 3rd down chain moving option-- someone who gets open early in the down, is reliable in traffic, and can pick up a little YAC.
That didn't hurt them against OAK, but that's mostly because OAK sucks. It has been an issue against good defenses, and likely will continue to be a weakness unless they make an acquisition.
I really don't like Martinez, but they aren't going to replace their defensive signal caller mid-season. And as long as they have Martinez, I really don't know who they can get to fix the situation next to him because of his limitations.
I am not saying that they have the answer to the other LB spot on the roster, but with Greene eligible to return, Campbell practicing, and Burks increasing playing time, I think they have more options there than they do in the slot.
I believe there is a need to shore up the tight end spot. They should trade for Howard, Eifert or Hooper. In that order.Let's operate under the assumption that Gute and Co. does in fact do a move...what position are you most hopefully he will move for?
BUT also what position do you actually think IF a move does happen is most likely to be the position?
Personally I've switched recently....I hope IF he does a move it is for ILB help...but actually believe it will be a WR possibly.
I’d say OT.Let's operate under the assumption that Gute and Co. does in fact do a move...what position are you most hopefully he will move for?
BUT also what position do you actually think IF a move does happen is most likely to be the position?
Personally I've switched recently....I hope IF he does a move it is for ILB help...but actually believe it will be a WR possibly.
I feel EXACTLY the same way. Looking for him to start creating TOs. Wishing he could cover. He calls the D as others have mentioned, but, I’m underwhelmed thusfar with Blake’s own performance within that D.Honestly, I'm a Martinez homer that kept hoping he would instill enough of a defense against the need for one...but I'm just not seeing his production as fitting to this defense. I do believe he will get paid and in the right system will eat up tackles and do well....just not here I don't believe.
If we had the 2018 version of Mo Wilkerson before he was injured we’d look much better. I’m starting to think they should re evaluate Lancaster and get Keke or Montravius more snaps. If they need more time then go after a formidable DT who could instantly improve the D Line. One more disrupter on the line and getting Savage back in run support could change the entire outlook.Sorry. You’re right. I was thinking DT for run stop. I have concerns with Lancaster.
I'm pretty sure Bucannon was recently picked up by another team. But I like the thought process. Not sure if ARI is willing to part ways with Red**** though, I think the Packers would have more success with acquiring Atkins. But his contract is like @thequick12 pointed out to large.Sorry. You’re right. I was thinking DT for run stop. I have concerns with Lancaster.
Haasan Red**** would be a great add in trade with ARI, but would cost a ton in draft capital. Great in coverage.
Bucannon would cost us nothing, and is also great in coverage.
Thanks, elcid. That's disappointing, as I thought GB would be a great place for him to flourish.I'm pretty sure Bucannon was recently picked up by another team. But I like the thought process. Not sure if ARI is willing to part ways with Red**** though, I think the Packers would have more success with acquiring Atkins. But his contract is like @thequick12 pointed out to large.