Dantés
Gute Loot
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2017
- Messages
- 12,116
- Reaction score
- 3,036
I honestly don't know. Nobody does.
But tieing up 18 million of your cap for 5 days in FA when your obviously looking for CBs is far from the "risk free move" that some would like it to seem
It seems like their timing was really intentional.
On 3/14, it came out that they were in talks with Rashaan Melvin along with the Raiders. On 3/15, it came out that Melvin was in contract discussions with the Raiders. He signed the next day with Oakland, the 16th, which was the same day that the Packers signed Fuller to an offer sheet.
I'm not claiming this as anything more than speculation, but the way that I read that situation is that Melvin was the last "first wave" guy that they were interested in. So when that fell through, either they didn't want to pay what Oakland paid or Melvin preferred the Raiders or whatever, they decided to give Fuller a shot. My guess is that anyone else on the market that was left at that point they felt strongly would stick around for a while, as free agency tends to slow down after that first week or so.
So I suppose you could say that it was a calculated risk. The reward of either landing Fuller or forcing the Bears to pay him on their terms outweighed (for the Packers) the risk of possibly missing on someone in the interim. If that was their calculus, then they were clearly correct-- no corner of note was signed in that time.