D
Deleted member 6794
Guest
Spriggs gained 20+ lbs last offseason and is over 320 lbs. His problem is staying healthy and on the field. Don't disagree that a high pick should be for an OT capable of either LT or RT and immediately servicable at OG.
Spriggs problem has been that he hasn't performed up to expectations by any means.
I’m still hoping for a FA and was sorry to not get Beasley. I’ve seen EQSB mentioned but think he’s too tall, and therefore too valuable, to put in the slot. I’d rather have him on the perimeter. Then again, maybe that creates a nice mismatch on the inside. And with Allison and MVS playing well, they could afford to move EQSB to the slot, selectively.
The Packers need to add a slot receiver this offseason. With the team having limited cap space the draft is the way to go.
OT, WR, RB.
Then hit the Defense hard day 2-3
I'm absolutely fine with the Packers drafting offense early this year but don't feel the need to add a running back over the first two days.
The article touched on LaFleur having plenty of 2 back sets in his system so maybe a playmaking back trumps WR.
I highly doubt LaFleur will use as many two back sets in Green Bay with Rodgers being the starting quarterback.
Even though it didn't go so well with Kevin King, I do love that #33 pick if the Packers can get it again. Gives the Packer staff a ton of time "on the clock" to really go over everyone available before making that pick or trading back again.
In my opinion having the 32nd pick is significanty better as it allows teams to use the fifth year option in case a player performs up to or exceeds expectations.