i'm not sure what you're looking for other than to argue? It's a 2 way street. Good QB's are harder to come by than good WR's, but it will always be a 2 way street. I've answered your questions multiple times in this thread and others if you've ever followed what I had to say on the subject.
Jennings was on the downside of his career, he did have a worse QB and what's your point? The QB matters, so does the WR. When your strength as a WR is catch and run, but the QB throws it over your head or in the dirt 50% of the time or you have to stop to catch it, they took away your greatest asset. Are you seriously suggesting a WR makes a QB make better decisions or throw a better ball? Jennings absolutely benefitted from Rodgers being so accurate and knowing where to go with the ball. Of course he did, who would argue that having a ball you can catch and run with, without breaking stride wouldn't benefit the receiver. But if you can't see how many times Jennings just turned guys around on his routes and left them grabbing at air when he was gliding past them on his way for another TD, you're missing half the game.
I never thought Jones was so great any place he was. Why didn't he make Carr better? Carr was a rookie QB on a bad, bad team. Recipe for success right? come on man. are you serious with this? A rookie QB on a bad team has Jones as his best weapon and you're comparing it to a QB that sat for 3 years, was not thrust into starting on a bad team, started on a good and experienced team where a receiver like Jones was his 3rd or 4th best option? anyway, as it stands, Jones stats with a rookie QB on a bad team were pretty much on par with his stats with a HOF QB on a better team. Why didn't Rodgers turn him into 1400 yard 10+ TD and 100+ catch receiver that year.
