because people tend not to blame the offense, they blame Rodgers and I think a lot of the blame is short sighted. First Seattle had one of the all time leagues greatest defenses that year. Outside of a poor pass that was picked to Cobb, I can't think of anything Rodgers did that game that cost them. All things considered he played pretty well IMO in Seattle.Same ole arguments.
He has solid wr unit until 2018?
He had a solid Def few times...but then people find fault with ST..
aka Seattle.
4 int the Def got and off got only 7 points? Or 10? Or 6.. But doesnt matter that Def plyed lights out and offense failed.. But then people only blame ST and Def for end of game failure.
This is when you say Rodgers had bad knee? Well prior game vs dallas? He seemed to play well
Dallas 125 rating same bad knee
Seattle 55 same bad knee
Its never ever Rodgers fault is the point...the main common denominator is rodgers has been qb since 2010 for the playoffs.
People can not find it in their heart to say Rodgers didnt perform well
Sure lot of reasons why losses..but start admitting rodgers could have played better.
Last year defense was a stud..offense was a dud.
You cant say Rodgers won a game and then never say he had a hand in a loss.
Arguments are so old and tired.
SsDd
They could have scored more 7's instead of 3's that much is certain, but they did get stuffed on some running plays. I remember Jordy stumbling out of a break on the goal line and what normally would have been a great pass, went right off his finger tips. I'm not blaming anybody in that situation, it happens.
GB hasn't been good at winning tight low scoring games in recent history. yeah, you could argue that we just needed to score more points, but sometimes you have to win the other way too and it seems that in big games unless Rodgers can lead them to a bunch of TD's we don't.
Heck Brady won a super bowl only scoring 13 pts. ANother super bowl he only scored 14 and lost.
Many great QB's have won and lost close low scoring games in the playoffs, they happen, it just happens that GB rarely wins those.
IN both seattle and last year, as well as the D played, they disappeared as well when it mattered most. Brady's defense didn't disappear when he only led them to 13 points in a super bowl.
Rodgers didn't really play poorly in either of those games. he didn't have a great game, but when you account for all the variables, it was far from poor. blame, sure, some. but it's way, way down the list.
P. Manning won a game 15-6 in the playoffs on his way to a super bowl victory. His barely 50% with a couple picks.
Kurt Warner, another HOF'er won a game practically in single digits against the bucs one time in a championship game to get to the super bowl that they then won too.
Yeah, Rodgers didn't play exceptionally well against seattle or the 9ers last year, but plenty of the other greats did much worse, and still won and got to super bowls and won.
Why doesn't GB unless Rodgers is great?
Last edited: