AKCheese
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2014
- Messages
- 2,549
- Reaction score
- 867
tough call
Dream scenario....Peppers is back and takes a bit of a pay cut. Dream scenario #2: Peppers is back and still has plenty in his tank to deserve what he will be paid. What I don't see is Peppers wanting to hook up with another team if cut by the Packers, so if he doesn't want to retire, he's a Packer. Dream scenario #3: Packers cut him, Vikings pay him big bucks and Peppers and the Vikings learn he should have retired this year.
I just don't think the guy is slowing down just yet.....we need him!
LOL you really think he's going to take a pay cut? If anything he'll make more money somewhere else if GB can't pay him.
10.5 sacks 9 Pro Bowls
There´s no denying Peppers was still productive in 2015 but at 36 years old it´s anyone´s guess when his play will decline. I have a hard time believing teams would line up to pay him more than $8 million a season if the Packers decide to release him.
First of all I like Peppers.
The financial part of My brain is starting to wonder if we're getting full value at that kinda dough. He's a great player but you have to reason that you could resign multiple existing FAs on our team or other teams or a combination of both and multiple positions of need at that price tag.
I think the fact that he has taken a leadership role and is such an easy fit that it leans towards one more year either way.
The financial part of My brain is starting to wonder if we're getting full value at that kinda dough. He's a great player but you have to reason that you could resign multiple existing FAs on our team or other teams or a combination of both and multiple positions of need at that price tag.
Hey, I'd like nothing more than to see Peppers finish off on a high note and our team playing at a high level. He deserves a ring after his stellar career and his chances with us are significant.Sure, you can Neal and Perry for the price of Peppers. You'll also be lucky to get the same production out of the 2 than just from Peppers. I'll take the one difference maker over the 2 role players.
I'm not concerned with 8M for Peppers. He's coming off a better 2015 than he was in 2014 and his cap hit will be less in 2016 than it was in 2015, so I don't see what leverage we have to ask him to take a pay cut.
Very few guys are going to give you double digit sacks for less than 8M.
If 2016 happens to be the year he falls off, so be it. We don't have any further commitment to him, so no big deal. But he didn't show any sign of it this year.
1) Why would Peppers agree to a pay cut? He clearly can play at a high level.
2) Why is a pay cut necessary? The Packers have ample cap room, nobody important to resign, and he's off the books at the end of next season. Packers look to be a little over $22M under the cap: http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/cap/
i'd like to see peppers here. i'm amazed by how the cap and salaries work in the NFL, and admit i pretty much don't understand any of it. i would assume however that if any renegotiation takes place, that both the pack and JP are clever enough to make it the same values for different reasons if we want to free up cap space(?)
thanks for that, certainly a bit of a simpler explanation than other articles i've tried to readContracts and cap space are a tricky thing. Here's a useful link to a breakdown of what it is: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1665623-how-does-the-salary-cap-work-in-the-nfl
If Peppers decides to play another season I want the Packers to bring him back, maybe renegotiate his contract to lower his cap hit.
The Packers will be able to roll over an additional $7.2 million in cap space not used for the 2015 season. Nevertheless re-signing some of our guys, hopefully selectively adding free agents to address positions of need and draft picks will eat up a lot of it. In addition the situation gets way more complicated in 2017 so Peppers agreeing to a pay cut would be beneficial going forward.