Packers vs Vikings Game Thread: I hate that Horn Edition

P

PackerDNA

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
7,069
Reaction score
1,956
Can't believe how better they are than us. Everything. Coaching. Line. Coverage. Quarterback. Everything. Jesus God we're not even close to being a contender this or next year
 
tynimiller

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,220
Reaction score
5,796
I feared our mindset vs Vikings would be a hurdle since they have everything to play for still and we really aren’t playing for anything (ticket already punched).

That said Love has looked off for sure, Reed is struggling and our defense is still very much a hot or cold snap to snap. We gotta get our mains back in on defense before I feel we are a legit contender, and yes only a fool to football would say we aren’t if we get Jaire, Quay and healthier Williams back there.
 
A

adambr2

Cheesehead
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
4,149
Reaction score
761
Another big game in which Matt Lafleur had his team completely unprepared to play, just a trademark of his tenure. But everyone loves him because they can rout the bad teams and everyone is happy on those days.
 
D

David Ciembronowicz

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 25, 2020
Messages
146
Reaction score
71
Location
iron river
Have been holding off commenting but this game now tells the truth of this GB team: they are good, they can beat inferior opponents but are not close to being elite. Their D is good but barely cannot get to Darnold at all, cannot cover receivers at all and have failed to execute throughout this game. The O is barely fair today, will say again that Love is not a $50M QB, not even in the top 15 in the league at this point and questions abound whether he "sees the field, recognizes defenses", has way too many throws that are off-balance, off back foot and frankly his accuracy is questionable. He does not give indications of being a "leader" in the huddle or THE guy who can bring this team up a level. The receivers have been awful in this game, not sure any of them are game changers against good defenses. GB will get a playoff game but don't be surprised if they lose the first game and don't be surprised if they lose next week to a terrible Bear team (they can play down to competition). Who on this GB team is a game changer on either side of the ball other than maybe Jacobs. LeFleur apparently did not do a good job in getting these pros up for the biggest game of their season (guess the players did not get ready themselves), this could be the beginning of a downward spiral for GB. Disappointing to watch this performance and lack of effort on the part of the entire team (except Jacobs- though he fumbled at the start of the game). Maybe a rebuild is in the forecast for a team that people thought was really good and is proving to not be in the class of Det, MN, Philly and unless they get a QB to play better, could they beat TB, Wash or the Rams. AFC, KC, Buff, Balt, Pitt and even Chargers are playing better today than this team. Tired of hearing "they are the youngest team in the NFL" as an excuse.
 
A

adambr2

Cheesehead
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
4,149
Reaction score
761
tynimiller said:
I feared our mindset vs Vikings would be a hurdle since they have everything to play for still and we really aren’t playing for anything (ticket already punched).

That said Love has looked off for sure, Reed is struggling and our defense is still very much a hot or cold snap to snap. We gotta get our mains back in on defense before I feel we are a legit contender, and yes only a fool to football would say we aren’t if we get Jaire, Quay and healthier Williams back there.
Click to expand...
The Packers had things to play for. They’ll be dropping to the 7 seed now and headed to Philly for round 1 if Washington wins out.
 
OP
OP
Zartan

Zartan

Cans.wav
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
2,555
Reaction score
993
If they don't get a TD here it's pretty much over
 

Members online

Total: 64 (members: 8, guests: 56)

Latest posts

Top